2012
DOI: 10.3917/grhu.086.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational socialization tactics: determining the relative impact of context, content, and social tactics

Abstract: Faciliter l’ajustement des nouvelles recrues par des tactiques de socialisation est essentiel pour maximiser l’efficacité du recrutement. L’objectif de cette recherche est d’analyser les influences relatives des tactiques de contexte, de contenu, et sociales, sur des mesures directes de la socialisation. Nous avons considéré comme variables expliquées l’apprentissage des trois domaines clés de la socialisation (l’organisation, le groupe de travail, et le travail) ainsi que l’innovation de rôle. L’échantillon e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although social tactics are commonly documented to exert the strongest effect on employee responses in work settings, the relative influence of context, content, and social tactics was found to vary across different responses. For example, Perrot et al (2012)'s study argued that social tactics were the most powerful predictor for learning outcomes, whereas content tactics were the strongest predictor for role innovation. Our study observed that among three OSTs, the impacts of social tactics on all three types of proactive behavior are strongest and the impacts of context tactics were generally weakest, with no significant relationship between context tactics and self-management found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although social tactics are commonly documented to exert the strongest effect on employee responses in work settings, the relative influence of context, content, and social tactics was found to vary across different responses. For example, Perrot et al (2012)'s study argued that social tactics were the most powerful predictor for learning outcomes, whereas content tactics were the strongest predictor for role innovation. Our study observed that among three OSTs, the impacts of social tactics on all three types of proactive behavior are strongest and the impacts of context tactics were generally weakest, with no significant relationship between context tactics and self-management found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important factor which can be incorporated into the model is perceived organizational support. Few past studies have demonstrated that perceived organizational support develops the commitment of employees – yet it has a negative impact on IQ (Perrot et al , 2012). Thus, one can confirm the effect of perceived organizational support on the outcomes of newly hired employees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-year usually serves as the key time frame to investigate newcomers' socialization (Bauer & Green, 1994). We approached the alumni members (Perrot et al, 2012) through M.Phil / PhD scholars of a chartered university to find out newcomers' employees. Several other studies of this field also used a similar method to approach new hire to study socialization (Ashforth et al, 1997;Ashforth & Saks 1996, Jones, 1986.…”
Section: Procedures and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%