2021
DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2021.1975305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational stress and well-being in competitive sport: a systematic review

Abstract: Research on organizational stress in sport has expanded within recent decades. Despite voluminous literature, no systematic reviews exist to congregate findings in a single, rigorous point of reference. Filling this void helps researchers and practitioners to understand organizational stress and its implications for health, well-being, and performance. The objectives of this study were to search for, appraise, and critically synthesize the literature on organizational stress (i.e. stressors, appraisals, coping… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many sport-specific risk-factors for athlete mental health are modifiable at different levels in the sporting context, and as shown in the current study, risk- and protective factors commonly involve the individual athlete, the close context around the athlete (i.e., coaches, family, teammates) as well as the context within the wider sports environment (see also Purcell et al, 2019 ; Reardon et al, 2019 ). The findings in this study emphasize contentions by other scholars who have stressed the importance to consider various levels of the ecological sporting context to enable a comprehensive understanding of both risk and protective factors and their interaction in relation to athlete mental health (Purcell et al, 2019 ; Kuettel and Larsen, 2020 ; Lundqvist, 2021 ; Simpson et al, 2021 ). Empirical knowledge of protective factors among sports populations has, however, until recently received sparse attention in sports psychology research and still constitute a limiting factor for the development of support systems targeting both performance and mental health among elite athletes (Breslin et al, 2017 ; Kuettel and Larsen, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Many sport-specific risk-factors for athlete mental health are modifiable at different levels in the sporting context, and as shown in the current study, risk- and protective factors commonly involve the individual athlete, the close context around the athlete (i.e., coaches, family, teammates) as well as the context within the wider sports environment (see also Purcell et al, 2019 ; Reardon et al, 2019 ). The findings in this study emphasize contentions by other scholars who have stressed the importance to consider various levels of the ecological sporting context to enable a comprehensive understanding of both risk and protective factors and their interaction in relation to athlete mental health (Purcell et al, 2019 ; Kuettel and Larsen, 2020 ; Lundqvist, 2021 ; Simpson et al, 2021 ). Empirical knowledge of protective factors among sports populations has, however, until recently received sparse attention in sports psychology research and still constitute a limiting factor for the development of support systems targeting both performance and mental health among elite athletes (Breslin et al, 2017 ; Kuettel and Larsen, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In sport, well-being has been studied in various populations, for example coach and practitioner well-being ( 72 76 ) and organizational well-being ( 77 79 ). However, for the purpose of this commentary and critique, we will focus on athlete well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…despite consensus within sport psychology literature that sub-optimal wellbeing can reflect an individuals' inability to cope with stressors (Dodge et al, 2012), no universal definition of wellbeing has been recognised in the social sciences (Simpson et al, 2021). Therefore, for clarity, given the nature of this case, wellbeing was viewed from a hedonic (i.e., subjective wellbeing, positive affect, low negative affect, and satisfaction with life) perspective (Dodge et al,2012;Simpson et al, 2021) TM had given AB consent to inform any staff deemed relevant by safeguarding, and a formal meeting between AB, myself, Tom's two coaches, the head of the academy, and the head of my department (sports science and medicine) was arranged. During the meeting, AB disclosed several sensitive details that TM had shared with him.…”
Section: Intakementioning
confidence: 99%