2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.0022-4367.2003.00073.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Structure and Performance: Evidence From the Nonlife Insurance Industry in Japan

Abstract: This study examines the impact of organizational structure on firm performance, incentive problems, and financial decisions in the Japanese nonlife (property-casualty) insurance industry. Stock companies that belong to one of six horizontal keiretsu groups have lower expenses and lower levels of free cash flow than independent stock and mutual insurance companies. Keiretsu insurers also have higher profitability and higher loss ratios than independent insurers. With a limited sample size, there is some evidenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, it is important to recognize that the Japanese insurance industry experienced severe industrial reorganization starting from the beginning of the 1990s. The high efficiency values found in our data might thus indicate efficiency improvements as a result of this reorganization process over the last 15 years (see Lai and Limpaphayom, 2003;Souma and Tsutsui, 2005 for the development of the Japanese insurance market; Amel et al (2004) report corresponding evidence for the Japanese banking market). The lowest efficiency values are found for the Philippines (average efficiency 0.22 in non-life).…”
Section: Technical Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this context, it is important to recognize that the Japanese insurance industry experienced severe industrial reorganization starting from the beginning of the 1990s. The high efficiency values found in our data might thus indicate efficiency improvements as a result of this reorganization process over the last 15 years (see Lai and Limpaphayom, 2003;Souma and Tsutsui, 2005 for the development of the Japanese insurance market; Amel et al (2004) report corresponding evidence for the Japanese banking market). The lowest efficiency values are found for the Philippines (average efficiency 0.22 in non-life).…”
Section: Technical Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, we consider total risk measured by volatility of profit ratios as a related indicator of performance. Similar to Lai and Limpaphayom (2003) and Liebenberg and Sommer (2008), the standard deviations of ROA and ROE over the past 5 years are calculated to measure the total variability of earnings. The costs of the higher returns may be greater variability of earnings distribution and higher probabilities of insolvency.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ROA and/or ROE as proxies for measurements of an insurer's financial performance are most common in the literature (e.g., Amit & Livant, 1988;Hill, Hitt, & Hoskisson, 1992;Lai & Limpaphayom, 2003;Mayer & Whittington, 2003;Pottier & Sommer, 1999;Wang, Jeng, & Peng, 2007). In line with Liebenberg and Sommer (2008) we perform an empirical analysis on both performance measures.…”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%