2015
DOI: 10.3844/jssp.2015.381.394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Well-Being in a Public Research Agency: The Point of View of Administrative Staff and Researchers

Abstract: Abstract:The aim of this paper is to investigate organizational wellbeing in a Public Research Agency, exploring the point of view of two different categories of workers, administrative staff and researchers, employed in the same organization. We hypothesized that, in a complex organization, the kind of work performed, along with other factors, could influence the representation of organizational well-being. The study involved 37 administrative staff and 24 researchers of the Italian National Research Council … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emery et al, 2014). Knowing how to communicate, for a public administration, is tantamount to promoting well-being not only between the citizenry and the public administration itself (Stivers, 1994;Capolupo et al, 2019) but also between public personnel (Col ı and Rissotto, 2015). This paradigm change has also focused attention on what from within public administration should not be overlooked: organizational well-being (Fida et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emery et al, 2014). Knowing how to communicate, for a public administration, is tantamount to promoting well-being not only between the citizenry and the public administration itself (Stivers, 1994;Capolupo et al, 2019) but also between public personnel (Col ı and Rissotto, 2015). This paradigm change has also focused attention on what from within public administration should not be overlooked: organizational well-being (Fida et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%