2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing CSR Communication: Challenges for Integrated CSR Communication from a PR and Organizational Communication Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in this study on the investigation of CSR impact on CSR authenticity showed a significant influence, and therefore consistency with results from previous studies (Alhouti et al, 2016;Jose et al, 2018;Liu and Jung, 2021). Although recent literature implies that a proof of a company's CSR engagement including a proof of its specific taken actions in CSR context will ensure authenticity and credibility, respectively, this study was not able to support a significant influence of CSR proof on CSR authenticity (Andersen et al, 2017;Ettinger et al, 2017;Jarolimek and Weder, 2017). A possible explanation of why proof was not found to be significantly influencing CSR authenticity is that a common and in-depth understanding of the necessity and the possibilities of proof might be missing among the participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results in this study on the investigation of CSR impact on CSR authenticity showed a significant influence, and therefore consistency with results from previous studies (Alhouti et al, 2016;Jose et al, 2018;Liu and Jung, 2021). Although recent literature implies that a proof of a company's CSR engagement including a proof of its specific taken actions in CSR context will ensure authenticity and credibility, respectively, this study was not able to support a significant influence of CSR proof on CSR authenticity (Andersen et al, 2017;Ettinger et al, 2017;Jarolimek and Weder, 2017). A possible explanation of why proof was not found to be significantly influencing CSR authenticity is that a common and in-depth understanding of the necessity and the possibilities of proof might be missing among the participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The mentioned antecedents were chosen, because studies found inconsistent results regarding the influence of the different types of motives (Alhouti et al, 2016;Ellen et al, 2006;Jeon and An, 2019). Moreover, this study includes CSR proof as a new antecedent to investigate its influence on CSR authenticity, addressing the assumption of a general mistrust in CSR activities caused by often observed inconsistency between corporate statements and actual actions taken, as well as hidden motives and low-fit scenarios (Gunawan et al, 2020;Jarolimek and Weder, 2017). Proof is included as new possible antecedent of CSR authenticity as it has never been investigated.…”
Section: Ejmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the potential for PR to communicate about sustainability can be spotted in the rather established fields of strategic CSR Communication (Jarolimek and Weder, 2017; Rasche et al, 2017; Weder et al, 2019b), climate change and environmental communication (Stecula and Merkley, 2019) and sustainable consumption communication (Golob et al, 2019; Linea et al, 2016). However, these approaches are also mainly functionalist or pragmatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%