1998
DOI: 10.2307/3152166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
755
6
16

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 746 publications
(792 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
755
6
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Product definition, development, launch and project management methodologies are highly contingent on the market uncertainty and other environmental characteristics (Brown and Eisenhardt 1995, Shenhar and Dvir 1996, Lynn et al 1996, Chandy and Tellis 1998. Insights on customizing product development practices to diverse environments such as small entrepreneurial firms and varied industries should also help increase the relevance and applicability of the development literature (Meyer and Roberts 1986, Dougherty and Heller 1994, Eisenhardt and Tabrizi 1995, Gatignon and Xuereb 1997.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product definition, development, launch and project management methodologies are highly contingent on the market uncertainty and other environmental characteristics (Brown and Eisenhardt 1995, Shenhar and Dvir 1996, Lynn et al 1996, Chandy and Tellis 1998. Insights on customizing product development practices to diverse environments such as small entrepreneurial firms and varied industries should also help increase the relevance and applicability of the development literature (Meyer and Roberts 1986, Dougherty and Heller 1994, Eisenhardt and Tabrizi 1995, Gatignon and Xuereb 1997.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some new product development researchers view product innovativeness as a separate, singular construct consisting of three dimensions (technological discontinuity, market discontinuity, and customer discontinuity) that is distinct from related constructs such as product advantage (McNally, Cavusgil, and Calantone, 2010). On the other hand historical innovation scholars (Chandy and Tellis, 2000;Sorescu, Chandy, and Prabhu, 2003) have typically used retrospective classifications based on experts as raters (e.g., academics or information obtained from public bodies such as the Food and Drug Administration), and define innovativeness as "the extent to which the technology involved in a new product is different from prior technologies [and] the extent to which the new product fulfils key customer needs better than existing products" (Chandy and Tellis, 1998). Likewise, Sorescu and Spanjol (2008, p. 115) define breakthrough innovations as "…new products that are the first to bring novel and significant consumer benefits to the market…" and incremental innovations as "…new products that do not deliver novel and significant consumer benefits to the market…", explicitly recognizing the role of novelty and superior consumer benefits.…”
Section: Product Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some literature offers more direct support for the effect of perceived technology newness on perceived innovativeness. For example, firms may sell radical innovations on the basis of the "sophistication and complexity of their technological attributes" (Gima, 1995), and other researchers (e.g., Chandy and Tellis, 1998;Sorescu et al, 2003) have highlighted the importance of technological newness as a factor in determining objective measures of product innovativeness. Interestingly, literature implies that technology newness might be viewed negatively by consumers.…”
Section: Key Findings and Insights From The Qualitative Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical results of these studies however remain mixed (Scherer, 1991). Others have focused on organizational aspects influencing the development of radical inventions (for an overview see Chandy and Tellis, 1998). In order to advance theory and practice we will argue that it is critical to understand the specific technological characteristics that influence the development of radical inventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%