2015
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2015.10722abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing Social Class: Implications for Working-Class Dignity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workplace instrumentalities are evidenced in several ways: employees are viewed as narrowly delimited role occupants, assumed to have no other interests or priorities than work, positioned as readily replaceable by someone or something that serves the organization better, and regarded as ‘bundles of human capital rather than as conscious, freely choosing agents’ (Islam, , p. 237; Karlsson, ). Another concern is that workplaces are rife with inequalities – from unequal distribution of material rewards, to asymmetrical power relationships and rules of interaction, to limitations on opportunities to engage in meaningful work, to disproportionately allocated space (privacy, safety, and comfort), and more (Lucas and Gist, ). These inequalities can influence respectful treatment, autonomy, and other key indicators of dignity (Sayer, ), as well as limit individuals’ agency in defending themselves in the face of dignity threats (Newman, ).…”
Section: Workplace Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workplace instrumentalities are evidenced in several ways: employees are viewed as narrowly delimited role occupants, assumed to have no other interests or priorities than work, positioned as readily replaceable by someone or something that serves the organization better, and regarded as ‘bundles of human capital rather than as conscious, freely choosing agents’ (Islam, , p. 237; Karlsson, ). Another concern is that workplaces are rife with inequalities – from unequal distribution of material rewards, to asymmetrical power relationships and rules of interaction, to limitations on opportunities to engage in meaningful work, to disproportionately allocated space (privacy, safety, and comfort), and more (Lucas and Gist, ). These inequalities can influence respectful treatment, autonomy, and other key indicators of dignity (Sayer, ), as well as limit individuals’ agency in defending themselves in the face of dignity threats (Newman, ).…”
Section: Workplace Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%