(2) switches on cytotoxicity towards A2780 human ovarian cancer cells (IC 50 values of >100 μM for 1 and 10.8 μM for 2). Ir-Cl hydrolysis is rapid for both complexes (hydrolysis equilibrium reached in < 5 min at 278 K). Complex 2 forms adducts with both 9-ethylguanine (9-EtG) and 9-methyladenine (9-MeA), but preferentially with 9-EtG when in competition (ca. 85% of total Ir after 24 h). The X-ray crystal structure of [(η 5 -C 5 Me 5 )Ir(phpy)(9-EtG-N7)]NO 3 ·1.5CH 2 Cl 2 confirms N7 binding to guanine.2D NMR spectra show that complex 2 binds to adenine mainly through N1, consistent with DFT calculations. DFT calculations indicate an interaction between the nitrogen of the NH 2 group (9-MeA) and carbons from phpy in the adenine adduct of complex 2.Calculations show that the most stable geometry of the adduct [(η 5 -C 5 Me 5 )Ir(phpy)(9-EtG-N7)] + (3b), has the C6O of 9-EtG orientated towards the pyridine ring of phpy, and for [(η 5 -C 5 Me 5 )Ir(phpy)(9-MeA-N1)] + (4(N1)a), the NH 2 group of 9-EtA is adjacent to the phenyl ring side of phpy. Complex 2 is more hydrophobic than complex 1, with log P values of 1.57 and -0.95, respectively. The strong nucleobase binding and high hydrophobicity of complex 2 probably contribute to its promising anticancer activity.