1992
DOI: 10.1139/v92-161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organometallic oxides and sulfides: preparation of [(η-C5H5)Ti]53-S)6, [(η-C5H5)Ti]53-S)53-S2)(μ4-O), and(η-C5H5)2Ti(SH)(μ-O)Ti(η-C5H5)(μ-S)2- Ti(η-C5H5)2 by reductive aggregation of (η-C5H5)2Ti(SH)2 with zinc powder or

Abstract: This paper-is dedicated to Professor Zdenek (Denny) Valenta on the occasiotl of his 6Stl1 birthdayFRANK BOTTOMLEY and ROBERT W. DAY. Can. J. Chem. 70, 1250 (1 992). Reduction of (q-CSH5)2Ti(SH)2 with zinc powder gave a mixture of products, of which [(q-C5Hs)Ti]5(p3-s)6 (I), [(q- CsHs)Til,(~3-S)s(~3-S~)(~~-O) (21, (T-CSH~)~T~(SH)(~L-O)T~(T-C~HS)(CL-S)~T~(T-C~S (3), [(T-CSH~)T~I~(CL?-SZ)~(P?-O)(0) (4), and [(T-C,H~)T~(CL~-S)], (5) were identified by a combination of fractional crystallization and X-ray diffracti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the symmetrical constraints induced by the two capping ligands. The average Ti−ONp, Ti−(μ-ONp), and Ti---Ti distances of 1.78, 2.03, and 3.04 Å, respectively, fall within the ranges reported for other Ti alkoxides. , The Ti−(μ 3 -Cl) distances of 1 (average 2.78 Å) is the longest observed, 2.470(5)−2.684(2) Å, whereas the Ti−(μ 3 -O) distance of 1.93 Å (average) is one of the shortest distances reported for μ 3 -oxo ligands, 1.962(4)−2.088(8) Å. , The angles adopted around the various metal centers of 1 are consistent with a slightly distorted octahedral geometry. The Ti−(μ 3 -OR)−Ti angle of 103.6° is consistent with other μ 3 -O ligated compounds. ,, The Ti−(μ-OR)−Ti angles of 96.6° (average) and the Ti−(μ 3 -Cl)−Ti angles of 66.2° (average) are the smallest angles reported for titanium alkoxides which range from 104 to 112° and 73.7(1) to 114.3(1)°, respectively. ,,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This is due to the symmetrical constraints induced by the two capping ligands. The average Ti−ONp, Ti−(μ-ONp), and Ti---Ti distances of 1.78, 2.03, and 3.04 Å, respectively, fall within the ranges reported for other Ti alkoxides. , The Ti−(μ 3 -Cl) distances of 1 (average 2.78 Å) is the longest observed, 2.470(5)−2.684(2) Å, whereas the Ti−(μ 3 -O) distance of 1.93 Å (average) is one of the shortest distances reported for μ 3 -oxo ligands, 1.962(4)−2.088(8) Å. , The angles adopted around the various metal centers of 1 are consistent with a slightly distorted octahedral geometry. The Ti−(μ 3 -OR)−Ti angle of 103.6° is consistent with other μ 3 -O ligated compounds. ,, The Ti−(μ-OR)−Ti angles of 96.6° (average) and the Ti−(μ 3 -Cl)−Ti angles of 66.2° (average) are the smallest angles reported for titanium alkoxides which range from 104 to 112° and 73.7(1) to 114.3(1)°, respectively. ,,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In addition to the adamantane structure 2 , two other structures are known or have been proposed for [Cp‘M] 4 A 6 clusters. Structure 10 was found for [Cp*Ti] 4 (μ 2 −Se) 3 (μ 3 −Se) 3 . Structure 11 was proposed for the cluster [Cp*Nb] 4 O 6 from spectroscopic evidence, and Bénard and co-workers calculated by ab initio methods that structure 11 , with D 2 h symmetry, was 26 kcal mol -1 more stable than the adamantane structure 2 for [Cp*V] 4 (μ-O) 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the older examples, Cp 2 Ti(SH) 2 , was first synthesized by Köpf and Schmidt in 1965 . The preparation was improved in 1980 by McCall and Shaver, but the reactivity of Cp 2 Ti(SH) 2 in the literature is limited . Important questions are whether deprotonated anionic forms of hydrosulfide complexes are stable and whether they show higher reactivity than neutral sulfides with electrophiles such as SO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%