2000
DOI: 10.1666/0022-3360(2000)074<0113:oaanic>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation and Anatomical Notation in Conodonts

Abstract: All aspects of conodont paleontology rely on the identification and description of homologous anatomical units or elements. But the current schemes of anatomical notation and terms for orientation were formulated at a time when little was known of conodont anatomy or skeletal architecture, resulting in some confusion and difficulties in their application. With improving knowledge of cono-donts, these problems are becoming increasingly acute. In an attempt to address current problems, we introduce new terms for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
108
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the descriptions, we have used the conventional orientational terms-anterior, posterior and lateralnoting that these do not relate to the anatomical orientation of elements (see Purnell et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the descriptions, we have used the conventional orientational terms-anterior, posterior and lateralnoting that these do not relate to the anatomical orientation of elements (see Purnell et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparatus notation is based on that of Purnell et al (2000), although terms to describe orientation (e.g., anterior, posterior, inner, outer, upper, and lower) are used conventionally (Sweet, 1981(Sweet, , 1988 and do not refer to true biological orientation. Descriptions are based on both Yamaan Us specimens and works cited herein.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5; hereafter 'conodont zone' is shortened to 'Zone'). Yields are composed mostly of P 1 elements (notation of Purnell et al 2000) of Polygnathus (c. 60%) and Ancyrodella (c. 20%). The remaining 20% are P 1 elements of Palmatolepis species (typically broken or juvenile specimens) and indeterminate P 2 and other ramiform elements.…”
Section: Fore-reef Facies Associations: Sedimentology and Biostratigrmentioning
confidence: 99%