2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation dependence of inhomogeneous magnetization transfer and dipolar order relaxation rate in phospholipid bilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
14
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the time dependence of the transverse relaxation function of the lipid‐bound protons in bilayers, the LDM also predicts the orientation dependence that is in agreement with experimental data. Indeed, the LDM‐predicted angular dependence of the relaxation function in flat bilayers ( per Equation ( 31 )) is similar to that found experimentally by Morris et al 48 Indeed, Morris et al measured the orientation dependence of the second moment (M 2 ) of the lineshape in an oriented phospholipid bilayer at 9.4T. They found a strong orientation dependence that was maximized when the bilayers were aligned perpendicular to and minimized near the magic angle (∼54.7°) and followed an orientation dependence given by the second Legendre polynomial squared.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the time dependence of the transverse relaxation function of the lipid‐bound protons in bilayers, the LDM also predicts the orientation dependence that is in agreement with experimental data. Indeed, the LDM‐predicted angular dependence of the relaxation function in flat bilayers ( per Equation ( 31 )) is similar to that found experimentally by Morris et al 48 Indeed, Morris et al measured the orientation dependence of the second moment (M 2 ) of the lineshape in an oriented phospholipid bilayer at 9.4T. They found a strong orientation dependence that was maximized when the bilayers were aligned perpendicular to and minimized near the magic angle (∼54.7°) and followed an orientation dependence given by the second Legendre polynomial squared.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…per Equation ( 31)) is similar to that found experimentally by Morris et al 48 Indeed, Morris et al measured the orientation dependence of the second moment (M 2 )…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a previous study, we found the changing linewidth to be the dominant mechanism determining ihMTR orientation dependence in a lipid bilayer sample under our experimental conditions. 17 However, the apparent orientation dependence of ihMTR in the healthy adult brain did not match this in vitro work. We believe that the discrepancy is due to a combination of the chosen ihMT frequency offset changing the apparent orientation dependence curve and also the natural heterogeneity of myelin across the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…11 It has also been found to vary significantly with fiber orientation in white matter in vivo and in a phospholipid bilayer model-likely due to the oriented nature of dipolar coupling in the myelin bilayers that wrap around axons. 12,17,18 Myelin water imaging (MWI) is another MRI method that is sensitive to myelin. This method isolates the short T 2 signal from water trapped between myelin bilayers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the nerve fiber orientation effects on T2 relaxation are weaker than the effects on T2* ( Kaczmarz et al, 2020 ), GRASE-based MWF was found to vary by approximately 35% for different white matter fiber orientations and to generally decrease with increasing fiber angles ( Birkl et al, 2021 ). While MT parameters such as the apparent transverse relaxation constant of the semisolid pool have revealed similar orientation dependence with peak values around 30° - 50° and decreasing values with higher fiber angles ( Pampel et al, 2015 ), ihMTR values were found to be maximized for fibers perpendicular to the main magnetic field ( Girard et al, 2017 ; Morris et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%