2016
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/13/134009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation dependent tribological behavior of TiN coatings

Abstract: The preferred growth direction of cathodic arc physical vapor deposition-produced TiN coatings changes from (1 1 1) to (2 2 0) with high voltage pulsed bias application in the presence of Ar gas. In this study, tribological properties of these coatings were investigated via reciprocating wear tests against an inert counterbody for observing the role of orientation on tribological properties. Friction coefficients and wear of (2 2 0) oriented coatings were observed to be significantly lower compared to (1 1 1) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in oxidation behaviour during the tribological tests could be associated with their stoichiometry and/or crystallographic orientation [37][38][39][40]. The change in the stoichiometry due to the preferential re-sputtering of coated flux at different bias voltages caused the variation between the chromium nitride and niobium nitride layers in the structure [41].…”
Section: Tribological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in oxidation behaviour during the tribological tests could be associated with their stoichiometry and/or crystallographic orientation [37][38][39][40]. The change in the stoichiometry due to the preferential re-sputtering of coated flux at different bias voltages caused the variation between the chromium nitride and niobium nitride layers in the structure [41].…”
Section: Tribological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas all other coatings (deposited at -40 V, -100 V, -150 V) with (200) preferred orientation were easily oxidised. The reason for this differences in oxide growth rate was suggested to be associated with surface energy of the different grain structures [37].…”
Section: Tribological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we have adapted this method to unfiltered cathodic arc systems and observed similar preferred orientation changes as seen in the filtered arc systems [6,7]. We also determined the critical role of Ar presence in the gas mixture in these changes [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To understand the tribological properties of these coatings, the influence of the chamber pressure on crystallographic orientation was studied. It is well known that crystallographic orientation influences tribological behaviour of the coatings [43][44][45][46]. In addition, Raman spectra were obtained from the corresponding wear track and wear debris of the CrN/NbN coatings to evaluate the nature of the oxides produced at the tribological contact.…”
Section: Tribological Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%