“…This fits within the framework of both the FT and Chebyshev decomposition results obtained for ϕ = 3.5 wt%. While, thus far the discussion has been overwhelmingly concentrated on conformational and interfacial aspects, the nonlinear dynamics could be dominated by the network orientation dynamics, e.g., see Natale et al (2018). In a first approximation, it could be conjectured that due to the gradual nature of chain conformation and confinement, such effects could be L/SCB PP/HrGO 3[origin = c]90Q 0 (ϕ)/Q 0 (0) ∝ ϕ, e 3/1 ∝ ϕ, v 3/1 ∝ 1/ϕ ϕ < 0.8 wt% MAOS: I 3=1 ∝γ 2 0 e 3/1 > 0; v 3/1 > 0 ϕ = 0.8 wt% MAOS: I 3=1 ∝γ 2 0 weak relative increase in Q 0 (ϕ)/Q 0 (0) e 3/1 > 0; v 3/1 ≈ 0, especially for ω = 0.6 rad/s ϕ = 1 wt% MAOS: I 3=1 ∝γ n 0 , n = n(ω) (ϕ ≈ ϕ c ) n ≈ 0.7 for ω = 0.6 rad/s; n ≈ 1.1 for ω = 1 rad/s; n ≈ 2, for ω > 2 rad/s significant relative increase in Q 0 (ϕ)/Q 0 (0) e 3/1 > 0; v 3/1 = v 3/1 (ω) v 3/1 < 0 for ω < 1 rad/s (v 3 < 0) v 3/1 > 0 for ω > 2 rad/s (v 3 > 0) v 3/1 weak dependence on γ 0 1 < ϕ < 3.5 wt% SAOS-MAOS: I 3=1 ∝γ n 0 , n = n(ω, γ 0 , ϕ) e.g., ϕ = 1.5 wt%: for ω < 2 rad/s, γ 0 ∈ [1, 10] %, n ≈ 0; γ 0 ∈ [10, 40] %, n = 2 for ω ≥ 2, → n = 2 e 3/1 > 0; v 3/1 = v 3/1 (ω, γ 0 , ϕ): e.g., ϕ = 1.5 wt%: for ω < 2 rad/s, γ 0 ∈ [10, 40] %, v 3/1 < 0; γ 0 > 40%, v 3/1 > 0 for ω > 2, v 3/1 > 0 ϕ = 3.5 wt% I 3=1 ∝γ n 0 ; with increasing γ 0 : n ≈ 1.1, n ≈ 0.2 and n ≈ 0.4 significant relative increase in e 3/1 , v 3/1 perhaps associated dominantly to the elastic stiffening response.…”