2002
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m205383200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation of d-Tubocurarine in the Muscle Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor-binding Site

Abstract: Ligand modification and receptor site-directed mutagenesis were used to examine binding of the competitive antagonist, d-tubocurarine (dTC), to the muscletype nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). By using various dTC analogs, we measured the interactions of specific dTC functional groups with amino acid positions in the AChR ␥-subunit. Because data for mutations at residue ␥Tyr 117 were the most consistent with direct interaction with dTC, we focused on that residue. Double mutant thermodynamic cycle analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ⍀ value significantly different from 1 indicates an interaction between the functional group on the ligand and the amino acid on the receptor. Although initially used for analysis of the interaction of peptide toxins with K ϩ channels (Hildago and MacKinnon, 1995), this approach has also been applied to identify points of contact between acetylcholine receptors and peptide toxins (Malany et al, 2000) or d-tubocurarine analogs (Willcockson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An ⍀ value significantly different from 1 indicates an interaction between the functional group on the ligand and the amino acid on the receptor. Although initially used for analysis of the interaction of peptide toxins with K ϩ channels (Hildago and MacKinnon, 1995), this approach has also been applied to identify points of contact between acetylcholine receptors and peptide toxins (Malany et al, 2000) or d-tubocurarine analogs (Willcockson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly weak interactions were observed in a double-mutant cycle analysis of the interaction of d-tubocurarine with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (Willcockson et al, 2002). Reeves et al (2003) developed a homology-based model of the 5-HT 3 R and carried out docking simulations using serotonin as the ligand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ⍀ value significantly different from 1 indicates an interaction between the functional group on the ligand and the residue in question on the receptor. Although initially used for analysis of the interaction of peptide toxins with K ϩ channels (Hildago and MacKinnon, 1995), this approach has also been applied to identify points of contact between AChRs and peptide toxins (Malany et al, 2000), AChRs and d-tubocurarine analogs (Willcockson et al, 2002) and granisetron and the 5-HT 3 R (Yan and White, 2005). Figure 3 shows two double-mutant cycles constructed for the interaction of dTC analogs with the receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations at residues ␣7-Asn111 and ␣7-Gln117 slightly decrease the potency for activation by ACh and pyrantel in a quantitatively similar manner, indicating that they do not govern pyrantel selectivity. The equivalent residues in the Torpedo AChR, ␥Tyr111 and ␥Tyr117, were reported to interact with d-tubocurarine (Chiara et al, 1999;Willcockson et al, 2002). Thus, it is possible that mutations at these residues affect only the affinity for agonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%