2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation of monoclonal antibodies in ion-exchange chromatography: A predictive quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our group has previously employed amino acid‐specific covalent labeling in combination with mass spectrometry (MS) to examine the binding regions of protein libraries generated from lysozyme and cytochrome C in a CEX system (Chung, Evans, et al, 2010; Chung, Holstein, et al, 2010). Kittelmann et al (2017) recently developed QSAR models for predicting the binding orientation of antibodies on CEX chromatographic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group has previously employed amino acid‐specific covalent labeling in combination with mass spectrometry (MS) to examine the binding regions of protein libraries generated from lysozyme and cytochrome C in a CEX system (Chung, Evans, et al, 2010; Chung, Holstein, et al, 2010). Kittelmann et al (2017) recently developed QSAR models for predicting the binding orientation of antibodies on CEX chromatographic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such consideration of the molecular electrostatic surface potential provides insight into the sensitivity of our CEX method to changes in this region of the molecule and is consistent with the strategy used by other authors to rationalize the preferred binding orientations of proteins exposed to ion exchange resins. 34,[47][48][49][50] A similar argument can be made for HIC (Figure 7), where the HC-CDR3 loop itself would provide a hydrophobic contact surface, while the elution order of less hydrophobic open conformation/more hydrophobic closed conformation can be rationalized by noting the relative deprotonated/protonated state of Asp-100 and Asp-118 in the proposed opened/closed conformations. In the case of RPLC (Figure 3a), the identical retention times of the two Fab peaks results from the aggressively denaturing method conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…While useful for R&D studies, such non-native sequence modifications, however, run the risk of increasing immunogenicity and anti-drug antibodies. Detailed computational analysis and modelling of the antibodies and fragments thereof (Fab, Fc) can reveal insights into their surface charge properties, which can be used to infer binding strength and orientations with chromatography ligands through QSAR modelling approaches in the case of ion exchange [ 11 ] or experimentally using NMR combined with MD simulations with mixed-mode chromatography ligands [ 12 ]. These kinds of studies can provide deeper mechanistic insight into molecular level binding between residues of the mAb and the purification resin functional group.…”
Section: Developability Assessment For Lead Antibody Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%