1964
DOI: 10.2307/2423290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientation of the Painted Turtle, Chrysemys picta

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 130. ABSTRACT:Thirty adult female Chrysemys picta were tested in a Y-maze to determine what factors caused orientation. The turtles were found not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noble and Breslau (1938) found hatchlings were attracted to high illumination. Ortleb and Sexton (1964) discovered that C. picta not only responded to light but were able to discriminate between light intensities of 0.1 foot candles. Light and temperature in the natural setting are usually closely linked and their respective effects may be confused.…”
Section: Spring Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Noble and Breslau (1938) found hatchlings were attracted to high illumination. Ortleb and Sexton (1964) discovered that C. picta not only responded to light but were able to discriminate between light intensities of 0.1 foot candles. Light and temperature in the natural setting are usually closely linked and their respective effects may be confused.…”
Section: Spring Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have documented homing in Chrysemys picta: Cagle (1944), Williams (1952), Gould (1959), Ortleb and Sexton 1964), Emlen (1969), andErnst (1970b). Emlen (1969) presented a strong argument for visual recognition of local topographic landmarks in orientation of C. picta.…”
Section: Vol 91mentioning
confidence: 99%