2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orientationally invariant indices of axon diameter and density from diffusion MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

25
996
7
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 644 publications
(1,029 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
25
996
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The contrast in the in vivo results may therefore reflect the detection of relatively large axon radii in certain parts of the corpus callosum—although our fits from substrates containing gamma distributions of radii suggest that while qualitatively meaningful, our axon radius index values are likely to be overestimates. Nevertheless, while Alexander et al 4 and Dyrby et al 8 have suggested that only very weak sensitivity to axon radius index is available at clinical gradient strengths, we have shown that using suitable priors can ameliorate the situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The contrast in the in vivo results may therefore reflect the detection of relatively large axon radii in certain parts of the corpus callosum—although our fits from substrates containing gamma distributions of radii suggest that while qualitatively meaningful, our axon radius index values are likely to be overestimates. Nevertheless, while Alexander et al 4 and Dyrby et al 8 have suggested that only very weak sensitivity to axon radius index is available at clinical gradient strengths, we have shown that using suitable priors can ameliorate the situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Refs. 4 and 25). We denote the isotropic volume fraction with f i and the restricted volume fraction with f r , subject to 0fnormali+fnormalr1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, scan times are long and the high 7T magnetic field and maximum gradient strength (400 mT/m) are impossible to achieve on a live human scanners, that typically operate at 1.5-3T and can achieve maximum gradient strength between 30-60 mT/m. Alexander et al [4] demonstrates measurements of axon diameter and density in the live human brain on a standard clinical scanner using a simplified AxCalibre model and multi shell high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI). The method relies on an experiment design optimization [5] to achieve sensitivity without the need of high gradient strengths and long acquisition times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%