Conspectus
Three-dimensional (3D) halide
perovskite (HP) solar cells have
been thriving as promising postsilicon photovoltaic systems. However,
despite the decency of efficiency, they suffer from poor stability.
Partial dimensionality reduction from 3D to 2D was found to significantly
meliorate the instability, thus mixed-dimensional 2D/3D HP solar cells
have been expected to combine favorable durability and high efficiency.
Nevertheless, their power conversion efficiency (PCE) does not live
up to the expectation, hardly exceeding 19%, in sharp contrast with
the ∼26% benchmark for pure 3D HP solar cells. The low PCE
primarily arises from the restricted charge transport of the mixed-phasic
2D/3D HP layer. Understanding its photophysical dynamics, including
its nanoscopic phase distribution and interphase carrier transfer
kinetics, is essential for fathoming the underlying restriction mechanism.
This Account outlines the three historical photophysical models of
the mixed-phasic 2D/3D HP layer (denoted as models I, II, and III
hereafter). Model I opines (i) a gradual dimensionality transition
in the axial direction and (ii) a type II band alignment between 2D
and 3D HP phases, hence favorably driving global carrier separation.
Model II takes the view that (i) 2D HP fragments are interspersed
in the 3D HP matrix with a macroscopic concentration variation in
the axial direction and (ii) 2D and 3D HP phases instead form a type
I band alignment. Photoexcitations would rapidly transfer from wide-band-gap
2D HPs to narrow-band-gap 3D HPs, which then serve as the charge transport
network. Model II is currently the most widely accepted. We are one
of the earliest groups to unveil the ultrafast interphase energy-transfer
process. Recently, we further amended the photophysical model to consider
also (i) an interspersing pattern of phase distribution but (ii) the
2D/3D HP heterojunction to be a p–n heterojunction with built-in
potential. Anomalously, the built-in potential of the 2D/3D HP heterojunction
increases upon photoexcitation. Therefore, local 3D/2D/3D misalignments
would severely impede charge transport due to carrier blocking or
trapping. Contrary to models I and II which hold 2D HP fragments as
the culprit, model III rather suspects the 2D/3D HP interface for
blunting the charge transport. This insight also rationalizes the
distinct photovoltaic performances of the mixed-dimensional 2D/3D
configuration and the 2D-on-3D bilayer configuration. To extinguish
the detrimental 2D/3D HP interface, our group also developed an approach
to alloy the multiphasic 2D/3D HP assembly into phase-pure intermediates.
The accompanying challenges that are coming are also discussed.