2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oriented RepPoints for Aerial Object Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During training and inference, all images are resized to 800 × 1333 without changing the aspect ratios. For a fair comparison with the compared methods, we follow the same dataset splits setting in [ 51 ], where the ratio between the training set, validation set, and testing set is 5:2:3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During training and inference, all images are resized to 800 × 1333 without changing the aspect ratios. For a fair comparison with the compared methods, we follow the same dataset splits setting in [ 51 ], where the ratio between the training set, validation set, and testing set is 5:2:3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical feature-capturing network (CFC-Net) [29] was proposed to extract better discriminative features. Li et al [40] proposed the oriented reppoints for aerial object detection.…”
Section: Arbitrary Oriented Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is built by taking the median values of points from the SemanticKITTI [60] point cloud, a semantically-labeled lidar scan captured from a ground viewpoint. The other is created by manually annotating Google Satellite images using QGIS [61] (the annotation can be automated by classifiers trained for aerial/satellite images [62], [63]). The aerial and lidar reference maps for Sequence 00 can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Kitti Dataset Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%