2009
DOI: 10.1093/jss/fgn048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and Classification of the Ancient South Arabian Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea was to develop a computer service, which takes a word-phrase in an Ancient South Arabian language as input and delivers the grammatical analysis as output: all possibilities for root, stem, person, number, gender, time, and origin, i.e. Sabaic, Minaic, Qatabanic, Ḥaḍramitic (see Avanzini, 2009 for the background of the classification of the languages). It should also separate prefixes, suffixes, conjunctions, and so on.…”
Section: Figure 102: Squeeze Sample Collected By Eduard Glasermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea was to develop a computer service, which takes a word-phrase in an Ancient South Arabian language as input and delivers the grammatical analysis as output: all possibilities for root, stem, person, number, gender, time, and origin, i.e. Sabaic, Minaic, Qatabanic, Ḥaḍramitic (see Avanzini, 2009 for the background of the classification of the languages). It should also separate prefixes, suffixes, conjunctions, and so on.…”
Section: Figure 102: Squeeze Sample Collected By Eduard Glasermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the linguistic data from ancient South Arabia have opened a new important field of research 4 that will make a significant contribution to a revision of the classification of the Semitic languages. 5 Halayqa simply points out that: "in other cases the Ugaritic lexemes have been separately compared with their cognates in Eblaite, Phoenician, Hebrew, Aramaic and Syriac, Arabic, Modern South Arabic and Ethiopic" (pgs. [15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%