2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and evolution of fault-controlled hydrothermal dolomitization fronts: A new insight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in the same order of magnitude as those predicted by 2D simulations of HTDs formed by flow along through-going faults (Yapparova et al, 2017), and also many field examples with sharp dolomitisation fronts (Grandia et al, 2003;Nurkhanuly and Dix, 2014;Shah et al, 2012). Detailed analysis of dolomitisation fronts within fault-controlled dolomite bodies in nature are remarkably understudied, however, and are likely complex; for example, Koeshidayatullah et al (2020b) show that reaction fronts can back-step in time, as progressive phases of recrystallization result in porosity reduction (overdolomitisation), restricting the extent to which subsequent fluids can flux away from the fault. An obvious benefit of flow simulations such as these is that they can provide information on the controls on dolomite body termination during the earliest phases of fluid flux, before porosity-permeability feedback becomes an important control on the extent of fluid migration and reaction.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Dolomite Frontssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This is in the same order of magnitude as those predicted by 2D simulations of HTDs formed by flow along through-going faults (Yapparova et al, 2017), and also many field examples with sharp dolomitisation fronts (Grandia et al, 2003;Nurkhanuly and Dix, 2014;Shah et al, 2012). Detailed analysis of dolomitisation fronts within fault-controlled dolomite bodies in nature are remarkably understudied, however, and are likely complex; for example, Koeshidayatullah et al (2020b) show that reaction fronts can back-step in time, as progressive phases of recrystallization result in porosity reduction (overdolomitisation), restricting the extent to which subsequent fluids can flux away from the fault. An obvious benefit of flow simulations such as these is that they can provide information on the controls on dolomite body termination during the earliest phases of fluid flux, before porosity-permeability feedback becomes an important control on the extent of fluid migration and reaction.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Dolomite Frontssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Simulations of structurally complex reservoirs are particularly challenging as they comprise discrete structures with properties that contrast strongly with those of the country rock and range over vastly different length scales (Matthäi et al, 2007). Variations in permeability and fault zone thickness are fundamental controls on fluid circulation and subsequent mineralisation distribution (Guillou-Frottier et al, 2020;Harcouët-Menou et al, 2009), whereas the effect on hydrothermal convection of other parameters, such as porosity, is considerably less significant (Gow et al, 2002;Kühn et al, 2006;Zhao et al, 2003). However, our models do not attempt to capture the complexities of flow within FDZs, for which the porous media formulation employed by TOUGHREACT is inappropriate.…”
Section: Model Limitations and New Insights From Simulations Of Dolommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the emplacement of igneous intrusions, the dolomite phases were formed from the hydrothermal fluids originated from the magma source (Figure 4(b)). The high-temperature origin of these dolomite phases is confirmed by the sharp color contrast and nonplanar crystal habit [62] (Figures 3(c), 4, 5(a), and 5(b)). In addition, the presence of hightemperature minerals (i.e., ankerite and diopside) may have resulted from the interaction between hydrothermal fluids with the host limestone, which is also confirmed by various studies where diopside mineral is usually found in skarn deposits [59] (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%