2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and evolution of LINE-1 derived “half-L1” retrotransposons (HAL1)

Abstract: LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons represent the most abundant family of non-LTR retrotransposons in virtually all mammals. The only currently known exception is Platypus, where it is found only in low copy numbers. Autonomous L1s encode two proteins, ORF1p and ORF2p, both of which are required for the transposition of L1s. L1 replicative machinery is also involved in the transmobilization of non-autonomous retrotransposons, such as diverse short interspersed repetitive elements (SINEs) and processed pseudogenes. He… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the lack of a 3′ poly(A) tract on L1 “driver” plasmids did not lead to enhanced trans -complementation from a second “reporter” plasmid that resembles a Half-L1 (HAL1) retrotransposon (Figure S6A; pL1.3/ORF1 mneoI ) (Bao and Jurka, 2010; Jurka et al, 2005; Smit, 1999). Instead, the efficiency of L1.3 ORF1 mneoI trans -complementation generally correlated with the steady state level of ORF2p expressed from the respective “driver” plasmids (Figures S3C and S6B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the lack of a 3′ poly(A) tract on L1 “driver” plasmids did not lead to enhanced trans -complementation from a second “reporter” plasmid that resembles a Half-L1 (HAL1) retrotransposon (Figure S6A; pL1.3/ORF1 mneoI ) (Bao and Jurka, 2010; Jurka et al, 2005; Smit, 1999). Instead, the efficiency of L1.3 ORF1 mneoI trans -complementation generally correlated with the steady state level of ORF2p expressed from the respective “driver” plasmids (Figures S3C and S6B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This long lasting coding capability would seems unusual for a “non-autonomous” family ( CMe - 1A ) if no function is associated with the Fanzor1 protein. Analogous cases exist in the so-called HAL1 “non-autonomous” families derived from the L1 non-LTR retrotransposons, which encode the first open reading frame protein (ORF1p) only, instead of both ORF1p and ORF2p [35]. ORF1p is a “nucleic acid chaperone with RNA binding [36] and nucleic acid chaperone activity [37], but ORF2p codes for the major Tpase with its endonuclease (EN) and reverse transcriptase (RT) activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ORF1p is a “nucleic acid chaperone with RNA binding [36] and nucleic acid chaperone activity [37], but ORF2p codes for the major Tpase with its endonuclease (EN) and reverse transcriptase (RT) activity. In the guinea pig genome the coding capacity of the ORF1p in the HAL1 retrotransposons has been maintained for a relatively long time (approximately 29 to 44 Myr) [35], implying that both the cis -encoded ORF1p and trans-encoded ORF2p are required for transposition of HAL1 elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombination between TE copies of the same family has been reported before [83-87], but the significance of this for TEs in general is rarely discussed. Our survey focused on variation in an approximately 1,600 bp sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%