2005
DOI: 10.3354/meps301055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin and fate of ice fauna in the Fram Strait and Svalbard area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of these nine, two were exclusively found at the northern mooring position: the pan-oceanic species Scina boralis as well as the iceassociated gammarid amphipod Gammarus wilkitzkii which is usually found in higher abundances at 0-100 m depth (Poltermann 1997). The species living at the underside of the ice may as well survive in the water column for a few days, when their habitat is disappearing through melting, before they sink to the depths (Arndt and Pavlova 2005;Werner et al 1999). Its occurrence at the northern mooring position suggested association to sea-ice, as at the northern location a longer duration of sea-ice coverage (23 and 60 days) in both sampling periods was observed compared to the central mooring site (7 and 4 days, respectively) (Bauerfeind, unpublished data).…”
Section: Amphipod Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of these nine, two were exclusively found at the northern mooring position: the pan-oceanic species Scina boralis as well as the iceassociated gammarid amphipod Gammarus wilkitzkii which is usually found in higher abundances at 0-100 m depth (Poltermann 1997). The species living at the underside of the ice may as well survive in the water column for a few days, when their habitat is disappearing through melting, before they sink to the depths (Arndt and Pavlova 2005;Werner et al 1999). Its occurrence at the northern mooring position suggested association to sea-ice, as at the northern location a longer duration of sea-ice coverage (23 and 60 days) in both sampling periods was observed compared to the central mooring site (7 and 4 days, respectively) (Bauerfeind, unpublished data).…”
Section: Amphipod Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that the swimming capability of ice amphipods is limited to short distances (Lønne & Gulliksen, 1991); however, there is evidence that G. wilkitzkii can afford the energy costs of swimming in the water column when it loses contact with the ice surface (Werner et al, 1999). It has recently been suggested (Arndt & Pavlova, 2005) that shelf areas, in particular fjords and bays, which are regularly impacted by drifting multiyear ice, are not sinks but rather retention areas for dislodged ice amphipods. These observations support the hypotheses that G. wilkitzkii is capable of surviving in ice-free waters and that it eventually recolonizes sea ice above shallow waters.…”
Section: Ecology Of Epibiotic Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-Arctic Rijpfjorden opens directly towards the Arctic Ocean with drifting sea ice influencing the fjord environment (Hop & Pavlova 2008 ; even though the difference in the temperature regime between the 2 fjords was pronounced, temperature probably had less influence on the species composition than did sea ice. While sympagic fauna drifting out in the Fram Strait is believed to be lost to the pelagial and benthos when the ice melts (Werner et al 1999, Arndt & Pavlova 2005, Hop & Pavlova 2008, the fate of these species when they are released from ice melting in shallow, seasonally ice-covered areas is not fully understood. There are indications that sympagic amphipods can survive ice-free periods in the benthic habitat and re-colonize the ice when it is reformed (Arndt et al 2005b).…”
Section: The Amphipod Scavenging Guildmentioning
confidence: 99%