1988
DOI: 10.1021/bi00422a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of DNA helical structure and its sequence dependence

Abstract: Conformational analysis of DNA shows that the origin of the B-form double helix can be attributed in large part to the atomic charge pattern in the base pairs. The charge patterns favor specific helical stacking of the base pairs. Base pairs alone--without backbones--have a strong tendency to form helix, indicating that the backbones play a rather passive role in determining the basic helical structure of DNA. It is mainly the electrostatic interactions determined by the charge pattern on base pairs that stabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, Zhurkin et al 24 applied Monte Carlo simulation on DNA to the problem, elaborated the idea, noted the possibility of context effects, and made the distinction between static and statistical bending, and issue of curvature vs. flexibility. Subsequent Monte Carlo simulations were reported by Maroun and Olson 99 (in the context of polymer statistics), and by Shore and Baldwin 108,109 and Jernigan and coworkers 25,110 , all of which are discussed in more detail by Olson and Zhurkin. 26 A promising alternative approach to the study of DNA curvature and bending based on MD simulations is being pursued independently by Lankas et al 111 The vehicle for this analysis is the sequencedependent elastic rod model of DNA developed in terms of parameters that can be identified with a Young's modulus tensor with respect to any welldefined subunit and define a flexible anisotropic rod model 112 for the DNA representative of the MD results.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, Zhurkin et al 24 applied Monte Carlo simulation on DNA to the problem, elaborated the idea, noted the possibility of context effects, and made the distinction between static and statistical bending, and issue of curvature vs. flexibility. Subsequent Monte Carlo simulations were reported by Maroun and Olson 99 (in the context of polymer statistics), and by Shore and Baldwin 108,109 and Jernigan and coworkers 25,110 , all of which are discussed in more detail by Olson and Zhurkin. 26 A promising alternative approach to the study of DNA curvature and bending based on MD simulations is being pursued independently by Lankas et al 111 The vehicle for this analysis is the sequencedependent elastic rod model of DNA developed in terms of parameters that can be identified with a Young's modulus tensor with respect to any welldefined subunit and define a flexible anisotropic rod model 112 for the DNA representative of the MD results.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…A:T base pairs exhibit a higher intra-base pair propeller deformation than C:G, a simple consequence of two Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds between base pairs, rather than three. Experimental data based on crystal structures 113 and theoretical energy calculations 17,24,110,114 indicate that ApA steps show little tendency for deformation or deformability with respect to B-DNA. An explanation has been offered in terms of steric clashes due to the large propeller ("a stack of carpenter's sawhorses is more difficult to push over than a stack of flat wooden planks" 115 ) and particularly favorable base pair stacking.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, modeling the interactions between the charge distributions has been less developed It is usual practice to use a dielectric constant that is either a constant,6 or some simple function of distance .9,28, 3 1-35 Such models do not take into account the effect on the electrostatic energy of the irregular boundary between the low dielectric solute and the high dielectric solvent that may contain Our laboratory has developed a method of calculat-145 ro1e. 6,[9][10][11][12][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] M ing electrostatic energies using the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann ( FDPB ) equation that takes these effects into account.36 This method, which is rigorous at the level of continuum electrostatics, has proven successful in predicting the pKas3' and redox potentials of proteins, 3 7~3 9 and the solvation energies of ions4' and small molecule^.^^^^^ We have recently applied the method to DNA, focusing on phosphatephosphate interaction^.^^ The present paper extends this work to base-stacking interaction^.^^ Our goals are to test simple dielectric models, and to assess the relative role of electrostatic and Lennard-Jones ( L J ) interactions in determining the sequence and conformational dependence of stacking energies in DNA. The present paper is limited to consideration of base-base and phosphate-phosphate interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent, the A, B, and Z helixes are deduced from crystals, and thus reflect average conformations. Beyond this, each DNA sequence shows an individual bending, which has been investigated extensively by other techniques (16)(17)(18). These studies resulted in different models providing sets of bending parameters for any triplet or quartet of consecutive bases, and, thus, can be used to describe the bending of any longer DNA sequence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%