2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b03694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of Open-Circuit Voltage Loss in Polymer Solar Cells and Perovskite Solar Cells

Abstract: Herein, the open-circuit voltage (V OC ) loss in both polymer solar cells and perovskite solar cells is quantitatively analyzed by measuring the temperature dependence of V OC in order to discuss the difference in the primary loss mechanism of V OC between them. As a result, the photon energy loss for polymer solar cells is in the range of about 0.7-1.4 eV, which is ascribed to temperature-independent and -dependent loss mechanisms while that for perovskite solar cells is as small as about 0.5 eV, which is asc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(190 reference statements)
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fullerene systems, there are a few examples breaking this Eloss limit, but advances in non-fullerene SMAs has led to more and more systems that combat this problem. Various attempts to reduce this offset by lowering the LUMO level of the acceptor material have resulted in a voltage loss and a drop in VOC, PCE and external quantum efficiency (EQE) [1,32,33]. Other groups have demonstrated an improved VOC in polymer-fullerene systems, with values exceeding 1 V, but always at the cost of JSC [34,35] or optical losses [6].…”
Section: Discussion Of Charge Separation Recombination and Voc Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fullerene systems, there are a few examples breaking this Eloss limit, but advances in non-fullerene SMAs has led to more and more systems that combat this problem. Various attempts to reduce this offset by lowering the LUMO level of the acceptor material have resulted in a voltage loss and a drop in VOC, PCE and external quantum efficiency (EQE) [1,32,33]. Other groups have demonstrated an improved VOC in polymer-fullerene systems, with values exceeding 1 V, but always at the cost of JSC [34,35] or optical losses [6].…”
Section: Discussion Of Charge Separation Recombination and Voc Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this equation, V G0 is the V oc achievable at 0 K, and γ is a temperature‐dependent parameter of the material (usually ≈3). According to the above equation with an assumed V G0 of 1.56 V, the expected V oc reduction is 120 mV when Δ T is 60 °C (d V oc /d T is ≈−2.0 mV K −1 ), while the measured V oc reduction is only 50 mV. The measured J sc also decreased, while the J sc of ideal solar cells should increase slightly.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Parameters Of the Various Device Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The V OC of a PSC is always less than the optical bandgap of the active layer. The detailed origin of the V OC in PSCs falls outside the scope of this manuscript, however, for the purposes of this manuscript, let us consider that the V OC is related to the bandgap of the material by some combination of losses in potential energy (V loss ) as photoexcited charge carriers are generated and extracted from the device (Equation ). VOC=normalEnormalg/qnormalVloss. PCE=min[300.25emnmitalicλ.25emonsetFluxfalse(italicλfalse) * QEfrfalse(italicλfalse)normalditalicλ,300.25emnmλ.25emonsetFluxfalse(italicλfalse) * QEbkfalse(italicλfalse)false(1QEfrfalse(italicλfalse)false)normalditalicλfalse)] * (normalEg(fr)/qnormalVloss(fr)+normalEg(bk)/qnormalVloss(bk)) * FF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The V OC of a PSC is always less than the optical bandgap of the active layer. The detailed origin of the V OC in PSCs falls outside the scope of this manuscript, however, for the purposes of this manuscript, let us consider that the V OC is related to the bandgap of the material by some combination of losses in potential energy (V loss ) as photoexcited charge carriers are generated and extracted from the device 18 (Equation ( 5)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%