2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2018.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the R(15 × 3) surface reconstruction of carburized W(110) - revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following we therefore label the R(15×12) structure as the carbon‐poor tungsten carbide layer (noted as WC p ) and the R(15×3) structure as the carbon‐rich tungsten carbide layer (noted as WC r ). The C coverage (C/W ratio) of the R(15×3) structure has previously been determined by AES to be 0.64±0.07 and from STM as 4/15, 2/5 (see SI Figure b) and 13/15 . The interpretation of STM data of complex surfaces such as the WC x superstructures strongly relies on theory simulations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following we therefore label the R(15×12) structure as the carbon‐poor tungsten carbide layer (noted as WC p ) and the R(15×3) structure as the carbon‐rich tungsten carbide layer (noted as WC r ). The C coverage (C/W ratio) of the R(15×3) structure has previously been determined by AES to be 0.64±0.07 and from STM as 4/15, 2/5 (see SI Figure b) and 13/15 . The interpretation of STM data of complex surfaces such as the WC x superstructures strongly relies on theory simulations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laterally averaging LEED and AES studies have given some insights into the periodicity and thermal stability of the two structures. C/W ratio of the R(15×3)‐C/W(110) structure was determined by AES to be 0.64±0.07, while the laterally resolved STM studies gave three different values . The R(15×3)‐C/W(110) structure was found to be stable up to 1100 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%