2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01201.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of the white shark Carcharodon (Lamniformes: Lamnidae) based on recalibration of the Upper Neogene Pisco Formation of Peru

Abstract: The taxonomic origin of the white shark, Carcharodon, is a highly debated subject. New fossil evidence presented in this study suggests that the genus is derived from the broad‐toothed ‘mako’, Carcharodon (Cosmopolitodus) hastalis, and includes the new species C. hubbelli sp. nov. – a taxon that demonstrates a transition between C. hastalis and Carcharodon carcharias. Specimens from the Pisco Formation clearly demonstrate an evolutionary mosaic of characters of both recent C. carcharias and fossil C. hastalis.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
176
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
176
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brand, Esperante, Chadwick, Poma Porras, & Alomía, 2004;Ehret et al, 2012;Esperante, Brand, Chadwick, & Poma, 2015;Esperante, Brand, Nick, Poma, & Urbina, 2008;Gariboldi et al, 2015;Lambert, Bianucci, & de Muizon, 2008;Lambert, Bianucci, & Post, 2009Lambert, Bianucci, Post, de Muizon, et al, 2010;Lambert, Bianucci, & Beatty, 2014;Lambert, de Muizon, & Bianucci, 2014;Lambert et al, 2015;Collareta et al, 2015). However, despite the growing significance of the vertebrate fauna of the Pisco Formation, a comprehensive stratigraphic framework for individual fossil-bearing localities and their position relative to one another has yet to be established (Brand, Urbina, Chadwick, DeVries, & Esperante, 2011;Di Celma et al, in press).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brand, Esperante, Chadwick, Poma Porras, & Alomía, 2004;Ehret et al, 2012;Esperante, Brand, Chadwick, & Poma, 2015;Esperante, Brand, Nick, Poma, & Urbina, 2008;Gariboldi et al, 2015;Lambert, Bianucci, & de Muizon, 2008;Lambert, Bianucci, & Post, 2009Lambert, Bianucci, Post, de Muizon, et al, 2010;Lambert, Bianucci, & Beatty, 2014;Lambert, de Muizon, & Bianucci, 2014;Lambert et al, 2015;Collareta et al, 2015). However, despite the growing significance of the vertebrate fauna of the Pisco Formation, a comprehensive stratigraphic framework for individual fossil-bearing localities and their position relative to one another has yet to be established (Brand, Urbina, Chadwick, DeVries, & Esperante, 2011;Di Celma et al, in press).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aguada de Lomas and Sud-Sacaco levels of the Pisco Formation are roughly 8-7 and 5-4 Ma (Messinian and Piacenzian, respectively; Muizon and deVries 1985). More recently, Ehret et al (2012) have reported a series of strontium isotope dates for the Pisco Formation, which in particular has resulted in a reevaluation of the age of Sud-Sacaco, which has yielded a 87 Sr-86 Sr date of 5.89 Ma. The geochronologic range of Piscobalaena can be summarized as 8-5.89 Ma (Muizon and deVries 1985;Ehret et al, 2012).…”
Section: Piscobalaena Nana Pilleri and Siber 1989mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the locality of the youngest stem ziphiid (Ninoziphius platyrostris, Sud-Sacaco, Sacaco Basin, Peru; Muizon, 1984 [44]) was recently re-dated to the Late Miocene (possibly early Messinian [50]). The extinction of stem ziphiids may thus be roughly synchronous with the Late Miocene appearance and early diversification of modern delphinoid families, including delphinids for which divergence date estimates fall within the Tortonian or-a less likely result considering the fossil record-the latest Messinian [47][48][49][51][52][53].…”
Section: (B) Broader Palaeoecological Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%