2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00593.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Pain in people with learning disabilities in residential settings – the need for change

Abstract: Accessible summary• Pain is not recognised and managed well for people with learning disabilities in residential settings -People with learning disabilities are not getting timely and appropriate 'as required' medication for their pain. • Staff do not use pain recognition tools or communication aids.• Some staff still believe that people with learning disabilities have a higher pain threshold than people without a learning disability. They also let this belief affect how they manage pain. • This research matte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with previous research, HAPs were not being used to their full potential, lacking personalised information and patient preferences (Beacroft and Dodd, 2009). Despite this, nurses had good knowledge of their patients' health complaints and presentations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with previous research, HAPs were not being used to their full potential, lacking personalised information and patient preferences (Beacroft and Dodd, 2009). Despite this, nurses had good knowledge of their patients' health complaints and presentations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Beacroft and Dodd, 2009). The finding that all patients were routinely prescribed and administered PRN analgesia, or another appropriate treatment for pain, was positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…WHO developed the analgesia pain ladder, recommending regular administration of pain relief where pain is suspected, with regular reassessment and review, recommending a recognised pain assessment tool and a three‐step approach to analgesic medication based on effectiveness and response (World Health Organization, ). Misconceptions by nurses and healthcare professionals regarding people with intellectual disability are that they are seen as a homogenous group, who are insensitive to pain and considered to have a higher pain threshold (Beacroft & Dodd, ; Symons, Shinde, & Gilles, ). However, this is not substantiated within research (McGuire & Kennedy, ) and current opinion is that the low‐level reports of pain are due to communication challenges rather than an absence of pain (Cleary & Doody, ; Kerr et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important mediating factor is the interpretation that others make of indicators of pain. Accessing appropriate health care may depend on parents or carers picking up and correctly interpreting indicators from people with an intellectual disability that they are in pain (Foley & McCutcheon 2004, Beacroft & Dodd 2010). However, beliefs, such that this group have a higher pain threshold than the general population (Beacroft & Dodd 2010), despite evidence that this generalisation does not apply to all people with an intellectual disability (Biersdorff 1994), may mean that signals are missed, misinterpreted or wrongly attributed to a cause other than pain (Kerr et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there is a body of research suggesting that people with an intellectual disability may not have the communication abilities to express when they are in pain or the nature of the pain they are experiencing (Regnard et al. 2007, Beacroft & Dodd 2010, 2011). As a result, many pain assessments for use by healthcare professionals have been developed on the basis of behavioural indicators (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%