2018
DOI: 10.20997/sr.19.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Originators of Reliability Coefficients : A Historical Review of the Originators of Reliability Coefficients Including Cronbach’s Alpha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its name is probably given because entering standardized covariances (i.e., correlations) into the formula of α yields the same value as this coefficient. However, it is a multiitem generalization of the Brown-Spearman formula rather than another version of α (Cho & Chun, 2018). For equal reliability, it requires a stricter condition than α: The data must be parallel.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its name is probably given because entering standardized covariances (i.e., correlations) into the formula of α yields the same value as this coefficient. However, it is a multiitem generalization of the Brown-Spearman formula rather than another version of α (Cho & Chun, 2018). For equal reliability, it requires a stricter condition than α: The data must be parallel.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value above 0.70 is considered acceptable: below this, the scale is not consistent enough. Cronbach's alpha values are lower for adaptive and direct selling propensity if an item in any scale is omitted (Cho -Chun 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The robustness of our questionnaire was verified through reliability analysis. The commonly used reliability coefficients include Cronbach's alpha (α), Alpha, split-half reliability, Kuder-Richardson formula, and Guttman split-half reliability [21]. This paper selects the Cronbach's α to measure the reliability of our questionnaire.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%