1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01808160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origins of life: A comparison of theories and application to Mars

Abstract: The field of study that deals with the origins of life does not have a consensus for a theory of life's origin. An analysis of the range of theories offered shows that they share some common features that may be reliable predictors when considering the possible origins of life on another planet. The fundamental datum dealing with the origins of life is that life appeared early in the history of the Earth, probably before 3.5 Ga and possibly before 3.8 Ga. What might be called the standard theory (the Oparin-Ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our understanding of the origin of life is speculative and so we can only assume that planets that have a diversity of habitable environments are also generative of life (1). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Origin Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, our understanding of the origin of life is speculative and so we can only assume that planets that have a diversity of habitable environments are also generative of life (1). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Origin Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, it is useful to divide theories for the origin of life on Earth into two main categories, depending on whether life originated independently on a world or was carried to that world from somewhere else (1). The latter category is usually called panspermia, and versions that involve both natural and directed panspermia have been considered (1).…”
Section: Origin Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Davies and McKay [1] divided them into the categories of Extraterrestrial and Terrestrial origins. Bada [2] classified the Terrestrial theories into two categories "The prebiotic soup theory" and "The metabolist theory" and tried to build a consensus by incorporating them into a general scheme of "the transition from abiotic organic compounds to autonomous self-replicating molecules capable of evolving by natural selection into ones of increasing efficiency and complexity …" The unified theory culminated in the RNA World.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of "How life on Earth evolved" is intimately related to another, perhaps more tractable, question "When did the Earth become suitable for habitation?" The later question is relevant regardless of whether life evolved on Earth or, if as some suggest, life "arrived" on Earth from an extraterrestrial source [Davis and McKay, 1996]. The establishment of conditions suitable for life on Earth is the end product of our planet's earliest geologic evolution, and the differentiation of the terrestrial hydrosphere and atmosphere.…”
Section: Introduction/backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%