Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origins of the Australian and New Guinean Aborigines

Abstract: Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) and Y chromosome studies indicate deep ancestry for both Australia and New Guinea peoples, with evidence for limited, shared genetic connection as well as ancient maternal lineages specific to both places. Several entry points into Sahul might explain haplotype distribution. Migration by northern as well as by a southern coastal route remain possible scenarios, as no single regional source population is identifiable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that in Southeast Asia and Oceania, the movements of dogs, and presumably humans, are much more complex than assumed. Indeed, genetic research finds little evidence of Neolithic or Austronesian gene flow into Australia (Bergström et al, 2016;Haak et al, 2010;van Holst Pellekaan, 2013;Karafet et al, 2005;McEvoy et al, 2010;Rasmussen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Multiple Immigrations-different Evolutionary Lineagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that in Southeast Asia and Oceania, the movements of dogs, and presumably humans, are much more complex than assumed. Indeed, genetic research finds little evidence of Neolithic or Austronesian gene flow into Australia (Bergström et al, 2016;Haak et al, 2010;van Holst Pellekaan, 2013;Karafet et al, 2005;McEvoy et al, 2010;Rasmussen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Multiple Immigrations-different Evolutionary Lineagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative hypothesis is that dingoes and NGSD are part of an older dog radiation that immigrated into Australia via the land bridge between Australia and Papua New Guinea, which flooded 6,000-8,000 years BP (Cairns & Wilton, 2016). Some ethnographic evidence supports this hypothesis, for example, the lack of Neolithic cultural items, such as chickens and pigs, in Australia prior to European colonization (Larson et al, 2010;Oskarsson et al, 2011), lack of human genetic signatures indicating contact between South East Asia and Indigenous Australians (Brown, 2013;Haak et al, 2010;van Holst Pellekaan, 2001Karafet et al, 2005;McEvoy et al, 2010;Pugach, Delfin, Gunnarsdóttir, Kayser, & Stoneking, 2013), and the finding that dingoes only carry the two ancestral Amylase gene copies, consistent with their having diverged from modern domestic dogs before the agricultural era (Arendt, Cairns, Ballard, Savolainen, & Axelsson, 2016;Freedman et al, 2014). More recent molecular dating efforts based on mitochondrial divergence time suggest that dingoes could have arrived in Australia approximately 8,000-10,000 years BP (Cairns & Wilton, 2016;Oskarsson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%