2008
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00491.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor eliminates hyperresponsiveness of the early diabetic proximal tubule to dietary salt

Abstract: Miracle CM, Rieg T, Mansoury H, Vallon V, Thomson SC. Ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor eliminates hyperresponsiveness of the early diabetic proximal tubule to dietary salt. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295: F995-F1002, 2008. First published June 18, 2008 doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00491.2007.-Heightened sensitivity of the diabetic proximal tubule to dietary salt leads to a paradoxical effect of salt on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) via tubuloglomerular feedback. Diabetic hyperfiltration is a feedback response to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diabetic proximal tubule, however, may have lost this characteristic of a differentiated nephron segment, and as a consequence, responds strongly to dietary NaCl, forming the basis for the salt paradox. Indeed, and supporting a role of diabetic kidney growth, pharmacological inhibition of ODC and tubular growth prevented the salt paradox (92).…”
Section: R1014 the Proximal Tubule In The Diabetic Kidneymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The diabetic proximal tubule, however, may have lost this characteristic of a differentiated nephron segment, and as a consequence, responds strongly to dietary NaCl, forming the basis for the salt paradox. Indeed, and supporting a role of diabetic kidney growth, pharmacological inhibition of ODC and tubular growth prevented the salt paradox (92).…”
Section: R1014 the Proximal Tubule In The Diabetic Kidneymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Unless stated otherwise, results are presented as group means Ϯ SE as generated by least-squares ANOVA, which pools the variance and redistributes according to sample size. This form of presentation conceals intergroup differences in raw variance, which were computed by the Fmax test (11) and are discussed separately. In addition to ANCOVA a nonlinear logistical model was used to parse the role of GTB from data on proximal reabsorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from these paired collections were exploited to 1) determine SNGFR at both extremes of TGF activation, which gives the range for the TGF response, and 2) characterize proximal reabsorption as a function of SNGFR as a method of testing the efficiency of GTB and for revealing primary effects of STN with and without losartan on proximal reabsorption. Justification for this method of analyzing proximal reabsorption has been developed in previous publications (11,26,29).…”
Section: Micropuncture Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubular fluid samples were assayed for volume by transfer to a constant-bore glass capillary and then counted for radioactivity to determine SNGFR. Data from these paired collections were exploited to characterize J prox as a function of SNGFR by linear interpolation (12,26,28).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test for primary effects on tubular reabsorption, one must control for differences in load delivered to the tubule by glomerular filtration. To accomplish this, we used tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) as a tool for manipulating single-nephron GFR (SNGFR) so that J prox could be determined as a function of SNGFR in each nephron as previously described (12,26,28). Late proximal nephrons were localized on the kidney surface and an obstructing wax block was inserted immediately upstream from the most downstream accessible segment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%