Orthodontic root resorption of vital and endodontically treated teeth

Mattison, Gordon D.; Delivanis, Helen P.; Delivanis, Philip D.; Johns, Priscilla I.

doi:10.1016/s0099-2399(84)80154-5

Cited by 39 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Consistent with the results of this review, animal studies histologically and radiographically evaluating OIEARR in vital and root-filled teeth identified no significant differences following orthodontic tooth movement (Huettner and young, 1955;Mattison et al, 1984;Mah et al, 1996). However, these experiments had minimal active orthodontic treatment time ranging from 42 to 120 days, a period that may be too short to show significant differences in OIEARR.…”

Section: Summary Of Evidencesupporting

confidence: 79%

“…Animal studies have not identified significant differences in OIEARR in vital and root-filled teeth (Huettner and young, 1955;Mattison et al, 1984;Mah et al, 1996). To confirm this clinically, human studies have radiographically compared OIEARR in root-filled and contralateral vital teeth; however, no systematic review has synthesized the results of these studies to date.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Radiographic comparison of the extent of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in vital and root-filled teeth: a systematic review

Walker

Tieu

Flores-Mir

2013

The European Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY Objective: to critically analyse the available scientific literature radiographically comparing the incidence of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption (OIEARR) in human root-filled and vital teeth. Methods: Several electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Google Scholar) were searched without limits, with the assistance of a senior librarian specialized in Health Sciences database searches. Human, in vivo studies that radiographically compared root resorption following fixed orthodontic treatment in root-filled and vital teeth were selected for full article review. Additionally, the bibliographies of the finally selected articles were hand searched to identify any relevant publications that were not identified by electronic searches. The lowest levels of evidence accepted for inclusion were case controls or cohort studies. Two authors independently reviewed and extracted data from selected studies. Results: A total of 165 original articles were identified from electronic database searches and 2 from hand searches. Once selection criteria were applied, only four articles met all inclusion criteria, and individual analysis of the selected articles was undertaken. Conclusions: Based on available evidence, root-filled teeth do not appear to be more susceptible to OIEARR than their analogous vital teeth.

show abstract

Section: Summary Of Evidencesupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic comparison of the extent of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in vital and root-filled teeth: a systematic review

Walker

Tieu

Flores-Mir

2013

The European Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Animal studies are controversial in that they show similar [11][12][13] or lesser 14 ARR levels in root-filled teeth than in vital teeth. In addition, earlier clinical studies comparing ARR levels in humans following fixed orthodontic treatment in root-filled and contralateral vital teeth have not proven consensual.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribution of cone beam computed tomography to the detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment in root-filled and vital teeth

Castro

Valladares‐Neto

Estrela

2014

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate whether root-filled teeth are similar to vital pulp teeth in terms of apical root resorption (ARR) after orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: An original sample of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 1256 roots from 30 orthodontic patients were analyzed. The inclusion criteria demanded rootfilled teeth and their contralateral vital teeth, while teeth with history of trauma had to be excluded to comply with exclusion criteria. CBCT images of root-filled teeth were compared before and after orthodontic treatment in a split-mouth design study. Tooth measurements were made with multiplanar reconstruction using axial-guided navigation. The statistical difference between the treatment effects was compared using the paired t-test. Results: Twenty posterior root-filled teeth and their contralaterals with vital pulp were selected before orthodontic treatment from six adolescents (two boys and four girls; mean [SD] age 12.8 [1.8] years). No differences were detected between filled and vital root lengths before treatment (P 5 .4364). The mean differences in root length between preorthodontic and postorthodontic treatment in filled-and vital roots were 20.30 mm and 20.16 mm, respectively, without any statistical difference (P 5 .4197) between them.Conclusion: There appears to be no increase in ARR after orthodontic treatment in root-filled teeth with no earlier ARR. (Angle Orthod. 2015;85:771-776.)

show abstract

“…Some believe that teeth with root canal treatment are more sensitive to root resorptions (2)(3)(4), while others did not observe significant differences (5,6). It was also reported that vital teeth are more susceptible to root resorptions than pulpless teeth (7,8).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Orthodontic Dental Movement on the Healing Process of Teeth With Periapical Lesions

Souza

Gandini

Souza

et al. 2006

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Orthodontic root resorption of vital and endodontically treated teeth

Cited by 39 publications

References 9 publications

Radiographic comparison of the extent of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in vital and root-filled teeth: a systematic review

Radiographic comparison of the extent of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in vital and root-filled teeth: a systematic review

Contribution of cone beam computed tomography to the detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment in root-filled and vital teeth

Influence of Orthodontic Dental Movement on the Healing Process of Teeth With Periapical Lesions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About