1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0987-7053(05)80169-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthodromic median and ulnar fourth digit sensory conductions in mild carpal tunnel syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison studies are most useful with mild disease or underlying polyneuropathy, and the sensitivity values of these studies are higher (82% and 77%) than those for standard conduction studies. 30,43,[55][56] The use of multiple potentially more sensitive tests (ie, comparison studies) deserves a note of caution, as these tests will decrease the number of false negatives, but also potentially may increase the number of false positives. 43,51 Redmond and Rivner 51 state that electrophysiologic procedures have, however, become so sensitive that they cannot only confirm the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in most patients but also detect an incidental finding in some asymptomatic subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison studies are most useful with mild disease or underlying polyneuropathy, and the sensitivity values of these studies are higher (82% and 77%) than those for standard conduction studies. 30,43,[55][56] The use of multiple potentially more sensitive tests (ie, comparison studies) deserves a note of caution, as these tests will decrease the number of false negatives, but also potentially may increase the number of false positives. 43,51 Redmond and Rivner 51 state that electrophysiologic procedures have, however, become so sensitive that they cannot only confirm the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in most patients but also detect an incidental finding in some asymptomatic subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key tests for the determination of a focal lesion in the median nerve is the comparison with another nerve (i.e., the radial or the ulnar) using either the same recording or the same stimulation site. This has been done by various authors using either antidromic or orthodromic techniques, with the fourth finger for the comparison to ulnar nerve and the thumb for comparison to radial nerve action potentials (Loong and Seah, 1971, Johnson et al, 1981, Johnson et al, 1987, Carroll, 1987, Pease et al, 1989, Uncini et al, 1990). This method has been found to have 90% sensitivity in differentiating nerve compression from polyneuropathy in diabetic patients (Imada et al, 2007, Gazioglu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Antidromic and Orthodromic Testing Of Carpal Tunnel Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen published studies were evaluated and met criteria for review compared with a reference standard of signs, symptoms, and one electrodiagnostic test. Twelve of these studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] were level IV and one 27 was level II. The reference standard used included signs, symptoms, and a different electrodiagnostic test than the electrodiagnostic test being evaluated in the study.…”
Section: Recommendation 3: Nerve Conduction Velocity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%