1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1478-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal Arrays

Abstract: brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. U se in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive narnes, trade narnes, trademarks, etc., in this publication, even ifthe former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such narnes, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Marks Act, ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
420
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 991 publications
(481 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
420
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of orthogonal arrays in statistically designed experiments are discussed Hedayat et al (1999).…”
Section: Combinatorial Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of orthogonal arrays in statistically designed experiments are discussed Hedayat et al (1999).…”
Section: Combinatorial Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In designing a fractional factorial experiment care must be given so that all factors have an undeviating weight on other factors, at all levels that the may take, and orthogonal arrays [6] [7] [8] [9] are used to that effect. In these arrays, each factor is equally influenced by the effects of the factors under study.…”
Section: Designing Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] The properties of Hadamard matrices (especially the above mentioned 4k-conjecture) is an intensively studied topic in combinatorics, and its complexity is impressive given the simple definition. [11,17,27,28,29] In 1933, Raymond Paley proved the existence of two families of Hadamard matrices that are very different from Sylvester's 2 n -construction. Proof: See the original article [24], or any other standard text on combinatorial objects [11,22,29].…”
Section: Definition 1 (Hadamard Matrix In Combinatorics)mentioning
confidence: 99%