2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal autoencoder regression for image classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They propose to combine the previous projection learning models with linear regression into one objective function and develop one-stage methods. The typical ones include sparse principal component regression (SPCR) [31], joint SPCR (JSPCR) [32], orthogonal autoencoder regression (OAR) [33] etc. To simultaneously take the local geometrical structure and discriminative information into account, Lai et al [34] imposed the L 2,1 -norm on the projection and LPP term to extract robust and discriminative features and proposed a generalised robust regression (GRR) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They propose to combine the previous projection learning models with linear regression into one objective function and develop one-stage methods. The typical ones include sparse principal component regression (SPCR) [31], joint SPCR (JSPCR) [32], orthogonal autoencoder regression (OAR) [33] etc. To simultaneously take the local geometrical structure and discriminative information into account, Lai et al [34] imposed the L 2,1 -norm on the projection and LPP term to extract robust and discriminative features and proposed a generalised robust regression (GRR) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the similar idea, double relaxed regression (DRR) uses two more flexible transformation matrices to address the problem of overfitting well [8]. The orthogonal autoencoder regression (OAR) method integrates relaxation linear regression and orthogonal autoencoder together for improving the flexibility of the label matrix and discrimination of the model [9]. However, the above methods ignore local geometrical structure and the spatial correlations among pixels for the image processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%