2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal dreams in an oblique world: A meta-analysis of the association between attachment anxiety and avoidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
58
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
20
58
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although anxiety and avoidance are traditionally viewed as orthogonal (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991;Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007), in many studies, these dimensions have been shown to be correlated (e.g., Brennan et al, 1998;Donbaek & Elklit, 2013;Fraley et al, 2000;Wei et al, 2007). Cameron, Finnegan, and Morry (2012) conducted a meta-analysis with the goal of examining whether attachment dimensions, assessed with the ECR and ECR-R scales, were orthogonal or oblique. These authors found that the average correlation was approximately .20.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although anxiety and avoidance are traditionally viewed as orthogonal (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991;Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007), in many studies, these dimensions have been shown to be correlated (e.g., Brennan et al, 1998;Donbaek & Elklit, 2013;Fraley et al, 2000;Wei et al, 2007). Cameron, Finnegan, and Morry (2012) conducted a meta-analysis with the goal of examining whether attachment dimensions, assessed with the ECR and ECR-R scales, were orthogonal or oblique. These authors found that the average correlation was approximately .20.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, both partners' attachment variables were included in a single couple model, allowing all possible correlational paths between the four attachment variables. A meta-analysis including 242 studies also recommended that the two attachment dimensions be correlated within individuals to account for shared variance (Cameron, Finnegan, & Morry, 2012). A correlation was also specified between partners' caregiving and sexual satisfaction variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECR has convincing and well-established psychometric properties and is currently among the most widely used self-report measure to assess adult attachment (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2007). An important advantage of the ECR is that it does not have the mentioned undesirable high intercorrelation between its subscales like the ECR-R as was shown in a recent meta-analysis (Cameron, Finnegan & Morry, 2012). Therefore, we join other researchers like Mikulincer and Shaver (2007), in their preference for the original ECR with its relatively independent subscales making it possible to differentiate within the relation with psychopathy facets with more confidence .…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 91%