2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020410118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal neural codes for speech in the infant brain

Abstract: Creating invariant representations from an everchanging speech signal is a major challenge for the human brain. Such an ability is particularly crucial for preverbal infants who must discover the phonological, lexical, and syntactic regularities of an extremely inconsistent signal in order to acquire language. Within the visual domain, an efficient neural solution to overcome variability consists in factorizing the input into a reduced set of orthogonal components. Here, we asked whether a similar decompositio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Benavides et al 5 reported a larger novelty response when changing the vowels of a bi-syllabic word (e.g., lili to lala ) compared to a change of consonants (e.g., lili to titi ). However, a recent EEG study showed that phonetic features were at the basis of speech perception in 3-month-old pre-babbling infants, offering the possibility of a structured combinatorial code for speech analysis not limited to vowels 58 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Benavides et al 5 reported a larger novelty response when changing the vowels of a bi-syllabic word (e.g., lili to lala ) compared to a change of consonants (e.g., lili to titi ). However, a recent EEG study showed that phonetic features were at the basis of speech perception in 3-month-old pre-babbling infants, offering the possibility of a structured combinatorial code for speech analysis not limited to vowels 58 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the traditional ERP technique ( Luck, 2005 ) imposes slow presentations rates around 1–2 Hz, with stimuli presented as discrete events, interspaced with long inter-stimulus intervals, SS-EP paradigms allow for stimulus repetitions in the range of 3–15Hz. Similarly, multivariate pattern analysis ( Ashton et al, 2022 ; Bayet et al, 2018 ; Gennari et al, 2021 ) is commonly implemented using slow-paced paradigms (although MVPA can in theory be performed on SS-EP data). Moreover, with an appropriate experimental design, the SS-EP technique allows for recordings from multiple stimuli or conditions presented in a single stimulation stream.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oscillatory nature of information content associated with sinusoidal components of the evoked response is, we argue, interpretationally problematic. Features resembling successive peaks in classification accuracy are quite commonly reported in the literature (T. Carlson et al, 2013; Gennari et al, 2021; Hogendoorn & Burkitt, 2018; Kurth-Nelson et al, 2015; Mohsenzadeh et al, 2018; Robinson et al, 2020), where they have occasionally been interpreted as evidence for complex underlying phenomena – for example, the activation of distinct feedforward vs feedback connections, or discrete and distinct stages of cognitive processing. As we have shown in Figure 2, successive peaks arise naturally from an evoked response containing sinusoidal components.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%