2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30106-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal Operators for User-Defined Symbolic Periodicities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, one must require that the periodicity can't be split in a finite number of periodicities that have adjacent intervals (cf. [14,15]). …”
Section: Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Essentially, one must require that the periodicity can't be split in a finite number of periodicities that have adjacent intervals (cf. [14,15]). …”
Section: Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This way one can represent structures like in Leban et al's approach (see [22]) where, through nested applications of dicing operators such as F<_, infinite periodicities can be introduced at any level of nesting. 3 We choose not to show here the corresponding PrA formula because we question the usefulness of such collections [14,15].…”
Section: More Complex Periodicitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations