1990
DOI: 10.1016/0097-3165(90)90059-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal tableaux and an insertion algorithm for SO(2n + 1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was notably realized by Berele in [1] for sp 2n , by Okada in [21] for so 2n and by Sundaram in [24] for so 2n+1 (see also [6] for a complete list of references). Nevertheless, it seems difficult to derive plactic relations from these schemes and to relate them to the Kashiwara crystal basis theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was notably realized by Berele in [1] for sp 2n , by Okada in [21] for so 2n and by Sundaram in [24] for so 2n+1 (see also [6] for a complete list of references). Nevertheless, it seems difficult to derive plactic relations from these schemes and to relate them to the Kashiwara crystal basis theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charaters so 2n+1 (λ, X ) can be interpreted in terms of a set of orthogonal tableau of shape λ, as denoted by O (λ) and introduced by Sundaram [39]. The Proctor tableaux [35] also leads to the same character as the Sundaram tableaux, and a weight preserving bijection of these two classes of tableaux is established by Fulmek and Krattenthaler [8].…”
Section: The Odd Orthogonal Charactersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find another application of this idea to the symplectic and orthogonal characters sp(2n) and so(2n + 1) by giving new flagged determinantal formulas for these two kinds of characters. They have been studied via various approaches, see, for example, [11,39]. Fulmek and Krattenthaler [11] give a proof for the determinant expression…”
Section: Flagged Determinantal Formulas For Sympletic and Orthogonal mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the Pieri rule for GL n is equivalent to the GL n to GL n−1 branching rule, the analogs for Sp 2n and SO n are noticeably more complicated than the corresponding branching rules. There is a description of such tensor products in terms of tableaux ([Su1,Su2]), but it involves erasing boxes as well as adding boxes, making descriptions of iterated tensor products somewhat awkward. However, two of the present authors ( [KL]) have found that an algebra naturally associated to the Pieri-like tensor products for Sp 2n and SO n , is a deformation of a Hibi ring, at least under a certain stability condition.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%