2014
DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.131265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst of the mandible: A rare case report with a systematic review

Abstract: Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is an odontogenic cyst was initially termed as the uncommon orthokeratinized type of odontogenic keratocyst by the World Health Organization. It usually occurs in mandible. Various studies have shown that OOC has typical characteristic clinicopathologic features when compared to other developmental odontogenic lesions such as dentigerous cyst and the keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT). Rare recurrence was noted after surgical removal of the lesion. The purpose of this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding also suggests that OOCs may originate from the oral epithelial component, whereas KCOTs originate from dental lamina (13). This would explain the occurrence of KCOTs in the posterior mandible, where the dental lamina is more active at the age that patients develop this lesion (1). In addition, the unusual histopathological findings of the present case (lichenoid changes and basilar hyperplasia) can be explained by the suggested origin of the OOC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding also suggests that OOCs may originate from the oral epithelial component, whereas KCOTs originate from dental lamina (13). This would explain the occurrence of KCOTs in the posterior mandible, where the dental lamina is more active at the age that patients develop this lesion (1). In addition, the unusual histopathological findings of the present case (lichenoid changes and basilar hyperplasia) can be explained by the suggested origin of the OOC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In addition, the unusual histopathological findings of the present case (lichenoid changes and basilar hyperplasia) can be explained by the suggested origin of the OOC. Additionally, less significant expression of p63 in OOCs compared to KCOTs suggests a lower proliferative and self-renewal potential for OOCs (1,14), which may explain the different clinical behaviors between OOCs and OKCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the low recurrence and lack of aggressiveness, OOCs should be treated by conservative approach with complete enucleation along with the removal of impacted tooth. [ 5 10 15 ] However, thorough sampling of specimen is required as the presence of parakeratinization and polarization should lead to the lesion being diagnosed as OKC that requires aggressive treatment. [ 5 ] The recurrence rate OOC is 2.2% which is far low than that of KCOT (recurrence rate 42.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5 ] The recurrence rate OOC is 2.2% which is far low than that of KCOT (recurrence rate 42.6%). [ 3 15 ] Table 1 summarizes the differences between OOC and OKC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suprabasilar areas often loosen up giving the appearance like a stellate reticulum [15]. OKC shares similar characteristics with Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst with respect to age of occurrence and site, yet these two lesions differ in their biological activity [16] OKC'S tend to grow in antero posterior direction within the medullary cavity of the bone and may cause an obvious bone expansion [13]. A hazy radiolucent lumen can be seen on a conventional radiograph which is suggestive of a dense proteinacious material such as keratin.…”
Section: (B) (C) the Exposed Cyst Involving The Angle-ramus Up To Thementioning
confidence: 99%