ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the short-term effects of a 1-hour floatation-resting environmental therapy (FLO) versus conventional napping (NAP) on heart rate variability (HRV) in highly trained individuals.Methods20 non-fatigued participants underwent a prospective randomised interventional study comparing the impacts of FLO and NAP on both supine and standing HRV. Measurements were taken before and after each intervention under controlled conditions, and subjective experiences were assessed through questionnaires.ResultsFLO and NAP were associated with changes in HRV parameters but did so differently. NAP significantly enhanced supine parasympathetic activity, as evidenced by increased log-transformed root mean square of successive differences (p=0.02) and power spectral density (p=0.03) relative to heart rate (HR) values, confirming its effectiveness in promoting autonomic recovery. In contrast, despite being better perceived regarding subjective well-being (p=0.04), FLO conferred no significant changes in supine root mean square of successive differences and decreased power spectral density relative to HR (p=0.02). However, post-intervention comparisons were not statistically different. While supine HR decreased significantly following both interventions, standing HR measurements showed a non-significant increase for FLO compared with NAP (p=0.056).ConclusionIn highly trained individuals, FLO and NAP demonstrated minimal impact on acute autonomic function. NAP appears more effective for enhancing short-term parasympathetic activity, while FLO provides a more enjoyable experience. These findings underscore the importance of personalised recovery strategies and emphasise the need for further research into individual responses and the long-term effects of these interventions.
