Orwellian Language and the Politics of Tribal Termination (1953–1960)

Kelly, Casey Ryan

doi:10.1080/10570314.2010.492821

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tribes were not consulted in the establishment of these interstate fisheries commissions nor permitted to serve as representatives. Moreover, during the period of formation of the interstate fisheries commissions (1940s-1960s), U.S. Federal Indian Policy was categorized as an era of termination where the federal government, often stemming from state government pressure, attempted to terminate the government-to-government relationship with Tribes and extinguish Tribal rights, especially those pertaining to natural resources [30][31][32][33].…”

Section: Indigenous Ocean Justice and Tribal Fisheries Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustaining Tribal Fisheries: U.S. Economic Relief Policies during COVID-19

Léonard

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reviews the individual spend plans of U.S. states granted a funding allocation under Sec. 12005 of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act to identify consistency with legislative mandates to support Tribal commercial, subsistence, cultural, or ceremonial fisheries negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing critical discourse analysis, this study identifies state discursive practices in supporting Tribal sovereignty in fisheries management for the advancement of Indigenous Ocean justice. State spending plans (n = 22) publicly available and submitted to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration before July 2021 were reviewed. Few of the state spend plans listed impacts to Tribal fisheries due to the pandemic. Only two state plans included Tribal consultation and direct economic relief for commercial, subsistence, cultural, and/or ceremonial losses faced by neighboring Tribes and Tribal citizens. Overall, the protections within the CARES Act for Tribal fisheries were not integrated into state spend plans. The article identifies best practices for state fisheries relief policy content that is affirming of Tribal fishing rights and uses them to help address the ongoing pandemic crisis facing Tribal fisheries. These findings have relevance for future emergency relief programs that are inclusive of Tribal Nations. Honoring Tribal sovereignty and the federal trust responsibility must be the cornerstone of shared sustainable fisheries.

show abstract

Section: Indigenous Ocean Justice and Tribal Fisheries Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%