2010
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000366113.15248.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Os Odontoideum

Abstract: There is a role for conservative treatment of an asymptomatic incidentally found, radiologically stable, and noncompressive os odontoideum. Conversely, surgery has a definite role in symptomatic cases. The main method of surgical treatment today is posterior decompression after reduction and fusion via independent C1 and C2 instrumentation. Irreducible, persistent anterior compression from os odontoideum can be approached by a transoral route with good results in experienced hands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
26

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
39
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, abnormally flattened articulations between the occipital condyles and atlas lateral masses have also been identified, increasing the degrees of movement at the craniocervical junction [7, 17-20]. Furthermore, as we saw in our study, there is also an increased incidence of bony abnormalities in the atlas (e.g., nonsegmentation or incomplete arch) and axis (e.g., os odontoideum) [1, 7, 8, 11, 19]. The combination of these abnormalities allows abnormal movement across the atlantoaxial junction or may cause excessive motion across a single level resulting in potential injury to the neurologic structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, abnormally flattened articulations between the occipital condyles and atlas lateral masses have also been identified, increasing the degrees of movement at the craniocervical junction [7, 17-20]. Furthermore, as we saw in our study, there is also an increased incidence of bony abnormalities in the atlas (e.g., nonsegmentation or incomplete arch) and axis (e.g., os odontoideum) [1, 7, 8, 11, 19]. The combination of these abnormalities allows abnormal movement across the atlantoaxial junction or may cause excessive motion across a single level resulting in potential injury to the neurologic structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Patients with Down syndrome face an increased incidence of radiographic instability, approaching 30% in some studies [1-5, 6, 7]. The actual number of symptomatic patients varies, however, but may be as few as 1.5% depending on how symptomatology is defined [7, 8, 9-13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is continued debate as to its etiology – congenital or traumatic – with studies and reports supporting the pathogenesis of both. [ 6 7 8 9 ] Whether congenital or post-traumatic, the anomaly occurs early enough in development of the spine for secondary findings to be seen, including a relatively foreshortened base of the dens and a hypertrophied anterior arch of C-1 [ Figure 3 ].…”
Section: Developmental Variants and Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also been reported, on occasion, to be a preventive treatment for spinal cord injury in patients without neurological symptoms. [ 1 3 4 ] Although the choice of surgical procedures for patients with atlantoaxial instability depends on the pathology of the instability, the patients' individual anatomical features, and their comorbidity, pre-operative imaging in the craniovertebral junction may often show concomitant diseases or conditions, such as osseous anomalies,[ 5 6 ] vertebral artery anomalies,[ 7 ] and congenital disease. [ 8 ] Knowledge of the treatments for these coexisting states can help the surgeon to prevent intra-or post-operative complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%