2007
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeatem.2007.6._os15-3-4-
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OS15-3-4 Improved Rail Shear Method of ASTM D4255/D4255M for Cyclic Shear Tests of Fibrous Composites

Abstract: This paper presents an improved rail shear method of ASTM D 4255/D4255M and the design procedure of new fixture for low cyclic shear loading. This fixture is designated to determine mechanical properties of in-plane shear modulus, nonlinear shear stress-strain curves, shear strength and visco-elastoplastic behaviour of fibrous composites under cyclic shear loads. A series of experiments have been carried out using the new rig to determine shear stress-strain response of unidirectional fibre reinforced laminate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shear characterization of unidirectional layers for composite materials continues being a not fully solved problem. In the last fifty years many different approaches have been proposed to solve this problem (rail shear test [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], thin-walled tube torsion test [8,9], off-axis tensile test [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], ±45º tensile test [23][24][25][26], Arcan test [27][28][29][30], Iosipescu test [31][32][33], asymmetric four-point bend test [34,35], plate twist test [36,37], v-notched rail shear test [38][39][40], off-axis flexural test [41][42][43] and shear frame test [44]), although anyone of these approaches has achieved an unquestionable support. In general, a characterization test must be as simple as a tensile test, and mainly for this reason, the most successful approach for shear characterization has been the ±4...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear characterization of unidirectional layers for composite materials continues being a not fully solved problem. In the last fifty years many different approaches have been proposed to solve this problem (rail shear test [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], thin-walled tube torsion test [8,9], off-axis tensile test [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], ±45º tensile test [23][24][25][26], Arcan test [27][28][29][30], Iosipescu test [31][32][33], asymmetric four-point bend test [34,35], plate twist test [36,37], v-notched rail shear test [38][39][40], off-axis flexural test [41][42][43] and shear frame test [44]), although anyone of these approaches has achieved an unquestionable support. In general, a characterization test must be as simple as a tensile test, and mainly for this reason, the most successful approach for shear characterization has been the ±4...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%