2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10587-013-0017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillation of even order nonlinear delay dynamic equations on time scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agarwal et al [1] studied oscillation of second-order dynamic equations and turned to the nonexistence of eventually positive solutions of a first-order dynamic inequality. Grace et al [13] and Erbe et al [9] investigated the oscillation of higher order dynamic equations to make a comparison with second-order dynamic equations and dynamic inequalities respectively. Jozef et al [7] also used the comparison method to study the oscillatory properties of (1.1) when T = R, and then, in 2017, they [2] continued the investigation to study nonoscillation properties of (1.1).…”
Section: Definition 11 a Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agarwal et al [1] studied oscillation of second-order dynamic equations and turned to the nonexistence of eventually positive solutions of a first-order dynamic inequality. Grace et al [13] and Erbe et al [9] investigated the oscillation of higher order dynamic equations to make a comparison with second-order dynamic equations and dynamic inequalities respectively. Jozef et al [7] also used the comparison method to study the oscillatory properties of (1.1) when T = R, and then, in 2017, they [2] continued the investigation to study nonoscillation properties of (1.1).…”
Section: Definition 11 a Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will also use the time scale version of a lemma due to Onose [15] for T = R. The result here is for an arbitrary time scale and since the proof of this result is similar to the proof of Lemma 2.4 in Erbe et al [14] we state it without proof. Lemma 2.4.…”
Section: Preparatory Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, using Riccati substitution, Hassan and Kong obtained asymptotics and oscillation criteria for the n th‐order half‐linear dynamic equation with deviating argument x[n1]normalΔ(t)+p(t)φα[1,n1](x(g(t)))=0, where α [1, n − 1]: = α 1 ⋯ α n − 1 ; and Grace and Hassan further studied the asymptotics and oscillation for the higher‐order nonlinear dynamic equation with Laplacians and deviating argument x[n1]normalΔ(t)+p(t)φγ(xσ(g(t)))=0. However, the establishment of the results in requires the restriction on the time scale double-struckT that g ∗ ∘ σ = σ ∘ g ∗ with g(t):=min{t,g(t)}, which is hardly satisfied, see conclusion 1 in for such a special case. For more results on dynamic equations, we refer the reader to the papers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the establishment of the results in [8] requires the restriction on the time scale T that g ı D ı g with g .t/ :D minft, g.t/g, which is hardly satisfied, see conclusion 1 in [9] for such a special case. For more results on dynamic equations, we refer the reader to the papers [5,6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%