2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory cerebral hemodynamics—the macro- vs. microvascular level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
154
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
23
154
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the amplitude of the HbR SSHO is only 11% smaller than that of HbO SSHO. In agreement with others (Reinhard et al, 2006; Watanabe et al, 2017), we found that the HbR SSHO were almost out‐of‐phase with the HbO SSHO, ΔnormalϕΔnormalHnormalbnormalOΔnormalHnormalbnormalRnormalπ. Therefore, the SSHO in total hemoglobin HbT (sum of HbO and HbR) is relatively small.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On average, the amplitude of the HbR SSHO is only 11% smaller than that of HbO SSHO. In agreement with others (Reinhard et al, 2006; Watanabe et al, 2017), we found that the HbR SSHO were almost out‐of‐phase with the HbO SSHO, ΔnormalϕΔnormalHnormalbnormalOΔnormalHnormalbnormalRnormalπ. Therefore, the SSHO in total hemoglobin HbT (sum of HbO and HbR) is relatively small.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although they explain the BOLD response (Boas, Jones, Devor, Huppert, & Dale, 2008) and (slow) oscillations at a coarse level (Fantini, 2014), they do not explain the characteristics of the slow oscillations we found in our measurements. Our measurements confirm the phase difference of 1 π between the oxy and deoxy oscillation found by others (Reinhard et al, 2006; Watanabe et al, 2017). These models lack an explanation for the local (sometimes overlapping) character of the slow oscillations, its stationary aspect, their slightly different oscillation frequencies and the phase shift across the oscillating region.…”
Section: Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…variations in the blood vessels diameter) associated with spontaneous hemodynamic oscillations in different frequency bands as such as the cardiac signal (i.e. heartbeat,~1 Hz), respiration (~0.3 Hz), low frequency (LF) (Mayer wave) (~0.1 Hz) and very low frequency (VLF) oscillations (b0.1 Hz) of different physiological origin (Cheng et al, 2012;Julien, 2006;Obrig et al, 2000a;Phillip et al, 2012;Reinhard et al, 2006;Tong et al, 2011;Toronov et al, 2000;Trajkovic et al, 2011). Also oscillations in the CSF (Droste and Krauss, 1997;Feinberg and Mark, 1987;Friese et al, 2004;Gupta et al, 2010;Kao et al, 2008;Strik et al, 2002) and even periodic displacements of the brain itself (Enzmann and Pelc, 1992;Feinberg and Mark, 1987;Poncelet et al, 1992;Soellinger et al, 2007Soellinger et al, , 2009) may contribute to the non-evoked signals.…”
Section: Classification Of Signal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this is demonstrated by the findings that the amplitude variations of the spontaneous LF oscillation can be caused by frequency variations of respiration. Respiration with the same frequency as the LF oscillation (0.1 Hz) leads to a resonance amplification (Cheng et al, 2012;Diehl et al, 1995;Obrig et al, 2000a;Reinhard et al, 2006) and the choice of the length of the stimulation period influences the amplitude substantially (Toronov et al, 2000). Furthermore the LF oscillation seems to be interconnected with stimulus/task-evoked functional brain activity (i.e.…”
Section: Classification Of Signal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it was shown that in adults stable 0.1 Hz oscillations of hemodynamic parameters induced by regular breathing at a rate of 6/min, bring about cortical hemodynamic responses that follow specific phase relationships due to cerebral autoregulatory action and circulatory transit times which can be measured by NIRS [6]. With hemodynamic impairment, as in unilateral carotid obstruction, these phases were significantly changed reflecting disturbed autoregulation.…”
Section: Abpmentioning
confidence: 99%