2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2015.2448519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory Motion of Permanent Magnets Above a Conducting Slab

Abstract: This paper provides the 3-D time-dependent analytical solution of the electromagnetic fields and forces emerging if a coil or a permanent magnet moves with a sinusoidal velocity profile relative to a conducting slab of finite thickness. The results can be readily used in application scenarios related to electromagnetic damping, eddy current braking, energy harvesting, or nondestructive testing in order to efficiently analyze diffusion and advection processes in case of harmonic motion. This paper is performed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the accuracy of the ANA method, in view of the degree of agreement between the FEM results and the test, the FEM results are considered to be accurate here. The relative difference between ANA and FEM results are quantified using the normalized root mean square deviation (NRMSD) [24]: NRMSD=1vnormaletrue0vnormale[FnormalbFEM(v)FnormalbANA(v)]2max[FnormalbFEM(v)]min[FnormalbFEM(v)]100% where v e is 20 m/s.…”
Section: Verification For Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the accuracy of the ANA method, in view of the degree of agreement between the FEM results and the test, the FEM results are considered to be accurate here. The relative difference between ANA and FEM results are quantified using the normalized root mean square deviation (NRMSD) [24]: NRMSD=1vnormaletrue0vnormale[FnormalbFEM(v)FnormalbANA(v)]2max[FnormalbFEM(v)]min[FnormalbFEM(v)]100% where v e is 20 m/s.…”
Section: Verification For Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the accuracy of the ANA method, in view of the degree of agreement between the FEM results and the test, the FEM results are considered to be accurate here. The relative difference between ANA and FEM results are quantified using the normalized root mean square deviation (NRMSD) [24]: NRMSD ¼ ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi…”
Section: Static Longitudinal Edge Effect Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the frequent experiments that has been, for years, a point of interest of many experimental and theoretical studies [1][2][3][4][5] and can be easily executed is the fall of a (neodymium) magnet through a thick-walled (well-conductive) copper tube. The popularity of these experiments is because of their highly demonstrative display.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%