1980
DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(80)90050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory phenomena in a model of infectious diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
5

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of different IPDs are used in the literature, including the exponential distribution (in the so-called general stochastic epidemic and implicitly in most deterministic models), the gamma distribution and an almost surely constant infectious period. It has long been recognised that the exponential distribution, though mathematically convenient as it means the epidemic process is Markov, does not provide a realistic model of the infectiousness of real diseases (see, for example, Grossman [28] and Keeling and Grenfell [29]). A fixed infectious period also offers some mathematical advantages and is usually more realistic than an exponentially distributed one, but it still eliminates a potentially important source of randomness in an epidemic model.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Infectious Period Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different IPDs are used in the literature, including the exponential distribution (in the so-called general stochastic epidemic and implicitly in most deterministic models), the gamma distribution and an almost surely constant infectious period. It has long been recognised that the exponential distribution, though mathematically convenient as it means the epidemic process is Markov, does not provide a realistic model of the infectiousness of real diseases (see, for example, Grossman [28] and Keeling and Grenfell [29]). A fixed infectious period also offers some mathematical advantages and is usually more realistic than an exponentially distributed one, but it still eliminates a potentially important source of randomness in an epidemic model.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Infectious Period Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted damping time for infections such as measles and pertussis is long, however, and a variety of processes such as seasonality in transmission and stochastic demographic effects (the inclusion of chance elements in the growth and decay of the susceptible and infectious populations) can perpetuate indefinitely the otherwise damped cycles Bartlett, 1956; (Grossman, 1980;Schwartz & Smith, 1984).…”
Section: Theoretical Predictions and Observed Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there is considerable mathematical interest in models of recurrent epidemic behaviour as a consequence of their non-linear dynamical properties (see Dietz, 1976;Nussbaum, 1977;Busenberg & Cooke, 1978;Green, 1978;Smith, 1978;Yorke et al 1979;Grossman, 1980;Gripenberg, 1980;Stech & Williams, 1981; Hethcote, Stech & van den Driessche, 1981Schwartz & Smith, 1983;Aron & Schwartz, 1984). The mass-action non-linearity, combined with incubation delays in the course of infection, may induce simple cycles or two-point and higher-order cycles (moving into chaos), depending on parameter values and precise model structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equilibrium stability analyses have been conducted on 'unforced' models that assume constant contact rates [6,7,[29][30][31][32], and bifurcation analyses have been conducted on 'forced' models in which contact rates vary seasonally [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]33]. Lloyd [7] found that the biennial pattern observed in the SI 1 R model is reproduced by the SI n R model but with much weaker seasonality.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Epidemic Models With Erlang-distributed Stage Dumentioning
confidence: 99%