2015
DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2015.1054880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory responses to reward processing in borderline personality disorder

Abstract: The results indicate multiple dysfunctions of feedback processing in patients with BPD, implicating several distinct subsets of reward-processing mechanisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
6
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 9 Beta- and theta-band oscillations respond to different features of the feedback stimulus: For example, the theta-band response has been reported to be mainly driven by feedback valence, 8 , 9 whereas high-beta oscillations are affected by additional aspects of reward-related stimuli such as their probability and magnitude. 6 , 8 , 10 Moreover, previous studies by our group and others indicate that the two types of oscillatory response are differentially associated with trait impulsivity: Both in healthy subjects 11 , 12 , 13 and in patients with borderline personality disorder and alcohol dependence, 14 , 15 impulsivity is associated with dampened theta-band oscillatory responses to negative feedback, an effect that involves the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and possibly also lateral prefrontal areas; 14 in contrast, beta oscillatory responses to reward are not correlated with trait impulsivity. 13 , 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 9 Beta- and theta-band oscillations respond to different features of the feedback stimulus: For example, the theta-band response has been reported to be mainly driven by feedback valence, 8 , 9 whereas high-beta oscillations are affected by additional aspects of reward-related stimuli such as their probability and magnitude. 6 , 8 , 10 Moreover, previous studies by our group and others indicate that the two types of oscillatory response are differentially associated with trait impulsivity: Both in healthy subjects 11 , 12 , 13 and in patients with borderline personality disorder and alcohol dependence, 14 , 15 impulsivity is associated with dampened theta-band oscillatory responses to negative feedback, an effect that involves the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and possibly also lateral prefrontal areas; 14 in contrast, beta oscillatory responses to reward are not correlated with trait impulsivity. 13 , 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Theta-band oscillations and the closely associated feedback-related negativity in response to negative feedback have often been reported to originate in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), 16 , 18 but other generators such as the posterior cingulate cortex 19 or basal ganglia 20 , 21 have also been proposed. High-beta responses to reward, on the other hand, have been localized in dorsolateral prefrontal areas 14 , 22 but, in one case, also in the ACC. 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear mixed models have several advantages over traditional repeated-measures designs, as they can accommodate departures from the assumptions of homogeneity of regression slopes and independence, and thus are better suited to model interindividual variability 38 , 39 . This model has also been successfully implemented by researchers to analyse EEG data 40 42 . In this study, the model included Group (3 levels: HC, AVH, non-AVH), Time (10 levels: from 0 to 900 ms in 100 ms steps), Condition (2 levels: LE and RE reports), and ROIs (2 levels: BA41, BA42) as the fixed-effects factors, Subject as a random-effects factor, and Gamma Synchrony as the dependent variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear mixed models (LMM) have several advantages over traditional repeated-measures designs, as they can accommodate departures from the assumptions of homogeneity of regression slopes and independence, and thus, are better suited to model interindividual variability [42]. This model has also been successfully implemented by researchers to analyze EEG data [43,44]. In this study, the model included Substance (2 levels: placebo, ketamine), Condition (2 levels: LE and RE reports), ROI (2 levels: BA41, BA42) and Time(10 levels: from 0 to 900 ms in 100 ms steps) as the fixed-effects factors, subject as a randomeffects factor, and Gamma Connectivity as the dependent variable.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%